No need for something like that. The Trustnet paper already provides human-meaningful labels. Brugeman, any plans to implement those labels to make ranking easier?
Sure - looks like a 5 point scale Trust weight (t) Semantic Human-meaningful label ---------------------------------------------------------- t == 0 no trust New person 0 < t < 0.25 low trust Acquaintance 0.25 >= t < 0.75 medium trust Friend 0.75 >= t < 1.0 high trust Peer t == 1 complete trust Partner
@brugeman check this out for social weight. I've already implemented it https://github.com/ArcadeLabsInc/arcade/wiki/ArcadeSocial#social-graph-reputation https://github.com/ArcadeLabsInc/arclib/blob/main/src/social.ts
It's there the Friend labels on the screenshot. Also on the 5-star ratings nostr:naddr1qq25gnzpveay5jns29z9xdrkdgehw5mvv46k6q3qarkn0xxxll4llgy9qxkrncn3vc4l69s0dz8ef3zadykcwe7ax3dqxpqqqp65wuucp8v
I see, but is it a drop-down menu i can choose from? Or does it just update the label when I slide the number? Could use more visual reflection in the bar too. Seeing those better reflected would help me a lot. Maybe others too
Those update as you move the slider. Maybe #nostrdesign team has any ideas?
Which labels were you referring to?
There are labels to the right of the profile name - Friend/Peer/Partner/Acquaintance/New person, it changes if you're dragging the slider (on the screenshot above). People questioned whether it's intuitive... I'd say never mind, the issue is too minor without the actual use or feedback atm.
I’m thinking about actual use fwiw. I remember @Martti Malmi had this in Iris version 0.1 and it was overkill. So he switched to just “friend or not friend” and when you follow someone it just assigns the friend for you. Maybe there is a happy middle ground though. Can I just select what they are without thinking about numbers? Remember MySpace “Top Friends”? Analysis paralysis haha