Oddbean new post about | logout
 For something to become money it must be #fungible. #Bitcoin is not. But it doesn't need to have a hard limit. #Gold was money for centuries, if not longer and it doesn't have a hard limit. Also, it's ironic that you are using large corporations to support your argument.

Bitcoin is good for saving. If you want money, you want #Monero.  
 Can you tell me more about why Bitcoin is not fungible? 

Before Bitcoin, you could argue that nothing was functionally finite except time. However, gold comes closer than most things: it is scarce and hard to produce, qualities which help make it a good money.

Whether we like it or not, large finance houses promoting Bitcoin means one thing above all: adoption. 

How decentralised is Monero? How many people likely hold it? Can you post me at any resources (genuinely interested to know)? 
 Bitcoin is not for the long term. Hard limit proves this. Doing the same thing that happened with land is unconscionable.