Won’t wot have significant limits at the scale of Wikipedia? There’s no way your extended circles will have significant weight on the majority of the published info.
It will skew to have weight in the edges of the things you might consult. Also, web-of-trust networks have far larger reach than is immediately apparent a due to exponentials https://townsquare.media/site/519/files/2020/03/GettyImages-1203443447.jpg
Are editors expected to maintain their entries on a topic? Will they become able to merge a fork and not care about it anymore eventually?
it would be cool to surface areas where diverging webs of trust overlap between teo npubs. I.e. I could search for where @saif and paul krugmans world views are similar
Yes, this is something I’m deeply interested in and will be exploring with some DVMs; I want to leverage “opposite” web of trusts where you can find people with whom you would disagree in things so you can discover points of view you agree with and disagree with. Kinda like Reddit’s “controversial” on steroids.