Who cares about who keeps custody? If his corporation rather has an institution keeping custody it’s his business. The guy outsmart most of us here so I will give him benefit of the doubt.

It would be awesome if banks start being custodians, that means more adoption, better stability and recognition.

If you only want retail to have BTC, you would still be being pizza with your 13 BTC.

It’s funny how hypocritical plebs can be, celebrating ATH but forgetting that it only happens because institutions and soon government will start aping in. Without the 9b Microstrategy bought, 6b BlackRock and all the other ETF that bought BTC wouldn’t be where it is right now.

Continue with your philosophical beautiful world of John Lennon but never forget, don’t bite the hand that feeds you. 

 You must have forgotten executive order 6102.

NGMI. 

 You must have forgotten that we are not all American.

YNGMI. 

 You’re actually retarded lmao we’re talking about saylor who IS IN America and America isn’t the only government to do something like that. 

 You lost any argument you had when you said "who cares about who keeps custody"