Probably biased towards victim of the establishment mentality if I’m being honest. But yeah, it is good entertainment. 

 Ugh .. I’ll do my best on mobile here ..

1. Zero actual evidence to support anything he claims. Always a “perhaps” and “I really think” or “it’s more likely “
2. Always leading interviewees to say something adjacent to the idea he puts forward so that production and editing can make it look like they are in agreement when in fact they are not. 
3. Takes his own “proof” and bases some other idea on top of that - basically forming a chain of unfounded claims.
4. “They” don’t like what he’s doing … ok buddy! 

His entire show is overdramatized and edited for maximum entertainment. I think they are kind of hoping the viewers doesn’t realize that there’s nothing actually connected to his claims of some ancient unknown advanced civilization. 

 Thanks!