Oddbean new post about | logout
 Except he’s not actually a felon 
 Ok simp 
 Yeah. You know nothing 
 Look cunt.

If you’re fine with lawfare and crooked courts you do you.

It also means you don’t believe in the rule of law.

You’ll be one of the first cunts to go when your Bolshevik masters come into power.

We shall rejoice.

Cunt. 
 Trump:  

Defrauded several contractors who did jobs for his real estate company.

Tried to use eminent domain to seize a little old lady's home so he could expand a casino parking lot.

Famously said "Take the guns first, due process later"

Don't talk to me about "rule of law" you statist bootlicker.

nostr:nevent1qqsf0k3syz62jv0yg3jswvtc2yg8m25as2plyg329eln00kuyz4nwgcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzpkwm5rs890dn200mqqsdu9v3y6h50e57zvl2jxaafr5tah3hxg8zqvzqqqqqqyd66j0z 
 Not an argument 
 It’s a perfect argument.

If you’re fine with lawfare don’t be surprised when it’s turned against you. 
 Trump has been doing lawfare since the 70's dude, he's one of the most notoriously litigious frauds in american history  
 It’s ma’am!

It’s one thing for people to use the courts.

It’s a completely different thing for the courts to be weaponized politically.

That’s Bolshevik territory, and we’re already there in some states.

Again, if you’re ok with that you will be eaten first.

Deservedly. 
 You’re not going to stop lawfare from being weaponized against you by voting you twat 🤣 

That’s like trying to stop a thief from stealing your stuff by asking them nicely to not steal your stuff. 
 Ok Jiahadi.

Whatever you say.

Dirka Dirka. 
 Vote harder cry baby. I’m sure this election will make real changes 🤣 https://image.nostr.build/825ac8395a118b97137f4f312f4fd0601e2d641a746d79528deae5c5b2091e8e.jpg  
 You walk in here and change the topic on “voting,” vs lawfare.

Fuck off. 
 You changed the topic first when you started doing your dirka dance retard lmao 
 Fuck, you’re retarded 
 Okay you think you’re smart. So tell me. How do you stop the weaponization of the courts? 🤔 
 It may be too late.

We think we sit on 3 pillars, but we don’t.

Courts have the last and final say given their ability imprison whoever the law say they can imprison.

Once that ability is corrupted we can only hope the population sees it and swiftly rebukes it by voting (!) out those that used it.

If that doesn’t happen then get strapped. 
 If it may be too late then that means the system was flawed to begin with. If it can be corrupted, it eventually will be. 
 Is this supposed to be an enlightened comment?

Did it take you years of thought, prayer, and jihad to come up with this one?

No system is perfect, they’re all flawed. What’s your point? 
 Jihadist is a new one. Usually retards like you think I’m black or Jewish 😂

If the system is flawed then why are you defending it? Because you’re a statist retard that can’t comprehend what a world without rulers would look like. When a game is rigged against you, the only rational thing to do is stop playing. But you’re clearly on the rag and too unhinged to think clearly. Have a nice day and GFY 🫡 
 There is no such thing as a world without leaders. 
 Never said anything about leaders. Nice misdirection cunt. 
 Leaders = rulers, rulers = leaders.

Great use of the word cunt though. 

Should be used more often. 
 This is the problem with statists like you. It’s hard for you to understand consent. 

The difference between a leader and a ruler is consent. Leaders and rulers are not the same. 
 They all have the same flaws. 
 Would you consider the use of eminent domain to seize property for a private business "lawfare?" 
 Example? 
 https://www.cato.org/commentary/donald-trumps-eminent-domain-love-nearly-cost-widow-her-house#:~:text=It%20wasn't%20the%20only,entertainment%20complex%20on%20the%20waterfront. 
 Yeah, retarded.

How long ago was this?

There’s a MASSIVE FUCKING DIFFERENCE between small eminent domain matters and STATE COURTS BEING WEAPONIZED.

If you’re too retarded to see the difference then you’re the reason 70% of our country shouldn’t have the right to vote. 
 And if you'd vote for a man who would literally steal from a little old lady, then you're disgusting and your mom is ashamed of you. 
 What the fuck are you talking about?

Every single one of them steal from every single one of us.

You’re focused on the dumb fuck lady that wouldn’t take the check? 
 Well, right now I'm focused on the dumbfuck statist bootlicker simping for a psychopath lol.

But you could just stop talking... 
 Then why would you vote for any of them 😂 
 he could have simply not broken the law by falsifying records relating to hush money payments. he's not clear of wrongdoing in this situation. 
 Dude is a champ 
 Did you mean chump? Or maybe even chump?  
 No one on Nostr is “fine with Lawfare”

You are making assumptions