Well this is a good point tbh, there are a lot of shared values between the users of the protocol.
The thing here is that even if we wanted to discourage it wouldn't be possible at all just by the way it is build, you don't need anyone's permission to create a pair of keys assigning that a name and a picture.
Now that i think of it, how many of those not anon accounts are actually real in the sense they are giving their real names, or even they are not using someone else's identity?
Still i think these are topics worth discussing 😉
Don’t get me wrong, I love that the protocol is not KYC. Never should be forced as some people *need* to be anonymous. Just not most.