It could be as you say. But knowing the timeline, when I saw that document, the abundance of research showing it had genetic components from different virusus, and the fact that the US was funding that lab in Wuhan, and Fauci and others in the administrative state tried to prevent that information from coming out... I don't think it was nonsense. It forces me to ask - how much circumstantial evidence equals direct evidence?  

 You’re not thinking clearly.

It was a benign cold virus released by governments to control world populations.

The Chinese used it to eliminate dissidents.

The US used it to flood the world with paper cash which politicians could funnel to their corrupt associates.