Absolutely! Not only that nut @OpenSats should also publish their selection criteria. The phrase 'Feel free to apply again in the future' can feel like a bad joke if your projects have no real chance of being funded.

Take @1440000bytes and his Joinstr project, which combines privacy and decentralization, yet it didn’t receive a grant. Why? Is it because Bitcoin mixing is considered too controversial for the organization after the Samourai case? 

'We have a minimum of 5 positive votes by the board for approval' sounds great but it says nothing about the reasoning behing those votes. It's like saying 'We've democratically decided to feed the cats but not the dogs', ok cool, but why?