Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Uno | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +2 
 In my opinion Digital property is still property so being told tomopen source it is the equivalent of someone telling you to open source your house and let people live in it free. 
nostr:nevent1qqst2ayt5nelxvkge7sz0kwxaed56hedzqgan7wfgyxd58qvltvpx0gpzemhxue69uhkzarvv9ejumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgq3q4q8uffuxxnhzd24u4j23kn8a0dt2ux96h5eutt7u76lddhyqa0gsxpqqqqqqz5rws0w
▲ ▼
Ava | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 i like you uno, but i very much disagree with you on this. not here to argue, but i need to see the code of anything i run, it's got to be open or i don't run it.

if you haven't already i encourage you to check out:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_(Anderson_book)
▲ ▼
Uno | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Like I said, I support the idea of open source if that's what someone wants to do, but devs should not be pressured to open source their work.
▲ ▼
ManiMe | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 And you think MORE state involvement would be better for open source?