It seems most of the issues you outline are resolved by simply using monero :monero: .
if the goal is poverty yes
>says this while advocating for someone else holding your money
yes better hold your keys and go broke holding an asset heading for zero
this scenario is still better than the promise of an asset, yes. like schrodinger's cat a promise is at the same time already at zero. asking permission = seeking denial
must suck living in your little bubble of a world
>says while thinking Monero heads to zero news flash from the real world: Monero is money. it is not investor or government friendly so the price is supressed. hard to get adoption from normies as well, so it stands well with only a handful of nerds, hackers and cypherpunks around the world. but when privacy and anarchy is the top priority, Monero is the number one choice, not IOUs of a potential high performing asset.
>the price is supressed lol