Oddbean new post about | logout
 Judge them by their stance on freedom of speech. 
 In terms of how they wrote things down, it’s literally the 1st fucking rule. 
 nostr:nprofile1qqs8d3c64cayj8canmky0jap0c3fekjpzwsthdhx4cthd4my8c5u47spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qy3hwumn8ghj7urjdau8jtt90pcx2unfd4jkuapwdah8yetwv3jhytnrdaks0duay6
nostr:nevent1qqsw5jzrshxugj8wjhk8zqw6p4c9dyc52m5sj7vjasyym62j2006ceqpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qcjw49ftnxene9wdxujz3tp7zspp0kf862cjud4nm3j2usag6eg2sxpqqqqqqzpvap5d 
 And their willingness to let the speech be distributed. 
 I just sent my first zap ever. Im so happy it was to you.  
 What people say about it and how they live it are most often in conflict.  Which stance should I judge them by?  And, come to think of it, why is this a high priority standard of judgment, anyway?

Been rethinking a lot if 'first principals' of late.  Some of them aren't withstanding scrutiny very well.