Unless you share the prompt data you used to produce these results, the analysis is meaningless.

This looks like an appeal to authority fallacy, where the authority is OpenAI.

I genuinely appreciate your posts about other protocols, but calling those who disagree with you propagandists is not likely to convince anyone. 

 Bots?

Impartial??

How is that at all possible to discent unless you've pored over the training data and test output for days on end? 

 What he said 

 No prompt no credibility