Oddbean new post about | logout
 >deemed intentional

As if there was any fucking question oh God I hate journalists with every fabric of my human reality. 
 The article is stepping on eggshells.
He wasn't "involved in a separate hit and run", he clearly intentionally rammed the car off the road. He wasn't "involved in other vehicle thefts that day", he was on a crime spree which culminated in a fucking murder. Did he commit more crimes afterward? We can only guess. 
 and shit like this
'oh he was ignorant and lacked awareness about the cycling community' no he's a nigger who was out nigging. you're not gonna reason him out of it

https://i.poastcdn.org/c15939c19cf2a06833f546265851b646c757b94a7893f70af4cfeff716ee39e4.png 
 Cyclists are generally insufferable creatures but for God's sake they are really beating around the bush here. He was killed by a nigger because that's what niggers do. It was intentional. There is no need to "have a dialogue" about cyclists we need to "have a dialogue" about niggers. 
 donut racism!!!! 
 he was run over because he was White, not because he was on a bike 

the fact he was on a bike just made him an easy target for those niggers and niggers LOVE easy kills 
 B-b-but raising awareness by having a conversation! 
 Whenever that phrase comes up you're about to hear some of the stupidest bullshit imaginable.