El Salvador. No question. There are literally thousands and thousands of bitcoin devs in the United States, bitcoin park, commons, other work spaces. Meetups. Conferences, and so much more. 99.9% of them have had zero issues, and won’t.  There are exchanges, thousands of companies, bitcoin on balance sheets, etfs, banks are allowed to hold it, there are miners, and on and on…


Roger Ver is a jackhole, he apparently doesn’t know how us tax law works. 
It’s laughable if you think El Salvador would allow privacy devs or any  bitcoin devs break laws(just or not) to just chill and work there. And as if they wouldn’t instantly deport those without passports, or arrest tax invaders, and serve expedition of said people back to the us.

It’s laughable. Dude, they just used europol, Finnish, fbi, DoJ, and other local law enforcement. El Salvador would put up zero fight. Bukele is a dictator, who happens to see bitcoin as a way to gain wealth and or popularity for tourism. Smart man, but a dictator nonetheless. 

 no country allow any criminals to hide under privacy DEV clock.
A) Salvador is next Singapore (SG has death penalty + canning law)
Mostly Anglo jerks can keep crying over n over again in English n spin it whichever way they like.

B) Dollar is concerstone of USA existence. doesnot matter WTF consitituion they have or other institutions or laws.

 

 I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you are blathering about?  What does any of that have to do with me answering OP question about which place is safer for bitcoin devices. 

 Bitcoin devs =/= bitcoin devices 

 It's called a typo. and notes are permanent. 

 Thought you were confusing what was being discussed 

 lol, no.