Just because data moved at the same time industrialization happened doesn't equal cause and effect. That's failure to utilize the scientific method. Who compiled the data? Who paid for that data to be compiled? What were their goals? Science is fraught with biases and flat out fraud in all directions. No study is all encompassing and only recently has anyone started paying serious attention to the impact of our sun. If you've been paying attention to the studies that focus on the sun you'll realize pretty quickly that something is changing rapidly to it and that definitely impacts Earth.

If the historical climate activist narrative was true we'd all be dead already, but they don't have a very good track record of being right because they use flawed, biased science.  

 So I ask, do you have a scientific answer?
And secondly, what is the purpose of this narrative based on erroneous facts?
I am genuinely interested. 

 Ben Davidson wrote "The Weatherman's Guide to the Sun" it is a heavily cited work--several hundred sources referenced. He also runs the Suspicious Observers YouTube channel where he covers solar events as they happen as well as regular updates on scientific findings. 

The purpose of the erroneous narrative is subjective. I'm not interested in that dialogue. It gets political very quickly and I don't play that game. Seek the truth and prepare accordingly.  

 i think James Corbett series on Anthropomorphic Climate Change ™️, the IPCC, and the unscientific Scientism cult are fascinating. 

https://corbettreport.com/qfc-ipcc/ 

 Thank you, I will try to read it.

About the erroneous narrative and underlying interests, I think it is interesting and important to talk about it openly. It may not be a scientific subject, but it helps to understand the positions of individual parties, and thus weigh their aims and intentions. 

 This assumes political parties are different and voting matters. I don't subscribe to those views. 

The only thing I care about is the truth and using that to prepare my family as best I'm able.  

 the problem in all of this is the weaponization and politicization of science and reason into encampments which have nothing to do with an honest desire for truth. and all of is are trying to figure out how to navigate this new norm.