Exactly, without mutes and the ability for relays to block/remove data based on spam algorithms, we’ll just see the experience ruined by spam.
I’ve brought up the censorship conversation a few times on Nostr. I think the general consensus is “build them but never have one ring to rule them all.” Each client should have a library of mute/ban setups that the user can choose from.
yes ! censorship should be non-destructive ! it should be based on users choosing to filter their feed not on information getting holocausted from the network. and it shouldn't even be up to the client. there should be blacklists any user can choose to install on any client to filter results. you should be able to run as few or as many of these blacklists as you want.
no spam on amethyst, get a better app if relays unreasonably censor then the diversity of views will be surpressed as is now on big tech do you hate diversity?
I hate the way diversity is shoved down everyone’s throat.
I use amethyst but I make my own nostr app nos.social so fixing it for myself is kind of my job.
spam blocking doesnt work well in amethyst until you have enough follows for reports to work, it fucks up your feed but global then works better, its why we need multiple lists and algos and a market for them you can copy whole follow lists with iris.to
i am going to state the obvious here but given you use it you should probably work on amethyst @Vitor Pamplona
I use it because I want to know what @Vitor Pamplona is up to and what the android nostr experience is like. I don’t use android as my primary mobile OS because it’s a ux, security and surveillance mess. 💣
Is that true of calyx/graphene as well?
Na. There are android builds which aren’t terrible. But I stopped using Linux on the desktop because I’m lazy and don’t want to spend all my time building and configuring my environment. 😁