The so-called "intellectuals" loved the ideas of Yuval Harari's, the WEF adviser, professor in philosophy and historian from Israel.
And many of them probably like his ideas about "human gods" - homo deus, and hoped that they could become part of this elite group of people.
They swallowed his presentation of the human race as narrative builders (that we love the concept of shared myths and that it's this that separates us from other species), and of the history of our civilization (where he don't make any attempt at explaining the enormous dfference between monetary freedom and monetary monopoly) and his ideas about economics (including that it's not enough resources for everyone, and that a two-class system therefore is both natural and necessary).
This messed up many people's belief systems, and I think it hampered their ability to think critically and logically.
Even many bitcoiners still admire Harari's writings.
So I thought, this is so wrong, and why hasn't Harari been seriously challenged?
His stuff if IMO just some New Age deconstructionist shit on steroids, and even smart people seem to fall for it.
In the end this led me to write a little book that we called UNBAR. I did it, because it's necessary that we rebel up and try to win the battle of the ideas.
I think my headline would have to include something with the battle of ideas, and possible the key concept of rediscovering the cost of freedom.
https://undoqo.com/pages/project-u
Book arrives Friday.
Looking forward to reading it.
I grew up in an affluent community, and it never ceases to amaze me how smart & wealthy people often lack moral and intellectual courage. They often treat their weird exclusionary ideas as some sort of merit badge that separates them from the plebeians. The more anti human the higher the status.
🤝
Your last sentence - I hope it changes totally if we get a sound monetary system.
Here is an article I wrote on the topic. Though it’s a topic you are highly educated on, hopefully it causes the reader to look at the issue of sound money from a slightly different angle.
https://www.samuelsadams.com/ssa/fixthemoney
Really enjoyed your article, I think we share many of the same ideas
Can you give some examples of thier lack of moral and intellectual courage?
An inability to see past their paycheck.
Meaning that anything that interrupts the flow of status or income is explained away with faux wisdom and reason.
Saying the vaccine is 100% effective is a great example.
Not agreeing with this statement meant interruptions to contracts and brought scorn from the corporate collective.
Is it a lack of courage, or simply a lack of critical thinking ability altogether? When fear (warranted or not) is involved, critical thinking is often pushed aside by survival instinct.
I think that critical thinking ability has declined in general though. And I blame social media algorithms for it. It has caused us to be bombarded with content designed to elicit engagement in the shortest time possible, obfuscating the need for critical thinking when it's needed most.
Great thought.
The human experience can not so easily be put into separate buckets. It is all so intertwined. An abundance of one can often compensate for a degree of lack in the other.
But yes, fear is certainly the highest axiom. The Fear of loss is why the affluent compliment the garments of the naked emperor.
To those who the system prefers, saying the obvious truth gains nothing but costs everything. Fiat gonna Fiat.
But does anyone actually pay attention? I'm starting to get the feeling that the WEF are yelling but no one is listening. Hard for them to get these crazy ideas implemented I feel.
I suspect they have many admirers who still listen