Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
laanwj | 1 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +10 
 can concur that dual-funding is a feature that works great, i made a lot of use of it when i had to rebuild my lightning node, it's a shame that it's so undersold
▲ ▼
laanwj | 1 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 from what i remember back in the day blockstream was heavily trying to get people to use PeerSwap instead (because dual-funding only solves the initial funding problem)
but they always have so many balls in the air
and LSP based approaches get so much more marketing behind them
▲ ▼
NVK | 1 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Didn't know you were on Nostr! 🔥
▲ ▼
ODELL | 1 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +4 
 UNFORTUNATELY HARD TO GET ANYTHING USED AT SCALE WITHOUT LIGHTNING LABS SUPPORT.
▲ ▼
waxwing | 1 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +4 
 True. But any 2 impls is fine here, I guess - because when you search for liquidity ads, even if only 15% of peers or whatever, are offering, you would still be motivated to do it to have balanced channels by default. The clearing price for liquidity would go down from current centralized providers (which are another CPOF for the state to attack), is my bet.