wat mean https://i.nostr.build/0MM9.gif  

 Change is (potential) attack  

 🥱 

 I don't think UASF can be categorically labeled an attack. Otherwise it would mean that miners largely control bitcoin- they alone get to determine whether or not a soft fork is done, despite only being a subset of stakeholders in the Bitcoin ecosystem. The possibility for a UASF spreads out that control and puts a check on miner incentives. 

 I agree with this! 

 i feel attacked 

 By not changing anything you have a 100% chances of shitcoins winning the race, but Bitcoin still survives and the message is sent. 
By changing the protocol you have 99.999% chances of shitcoins winning the race, but Bitcoin does not survive. 

Segwit brought the narrowly avoided inflation bug and now Ordinals. But man is the only animal that trips twice over the same stone.