You attain 100,000,000 Satoshi’s faster and with less electricity expenses when your transaction fees are through the roof fren. Check out the Braiins pool calculator……….
💥 𝕳𝖆𝖕𝖕𝖞 𝕹𝖊𝖜 𝖄𝖊𝖆𝖗!💥
You earn more revenue when you mine a block, but that has nothing to do with the cost of mining it.
⭐ Starknet Whitelist Registration is now live. ⭐ https://telegra.ph/starknet-10-10 Claim Your free $STRK.
𝑯𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒚 𝑵𝒆𝒘 𝒀𝒆𝒂𝒓!💥
💥💥 𝓗𝓪𝓹𝓹𝔂 𝓝𝓮𝔀 𝓨𝓮𝓪𝓻!💥💥
𝕳𝖆𝖕𝖕𝖞 𝕹𝖊𝖜 𝖄𝖊𝖆𝖗!🥂
ℍ𝕒𝕡𝕡𝕪 ℕ𝕖𝕨 𝕐𝕖𝕒𝕣! 🍾
💥💥 𝓗𝓪𝓹𝓹𝔂 𝓝𝓮𝔀 𝓨𝓮𝓪𝓻!💥💥
💥 𝕳𝖆𝖕𝖕𝖞 𝕹𝖊𝖜 𝖄𝖊𝖆𝖗!💥
The attainment of 100,000,000 Satoshis through the subsidity and fees is obtained with an overall lower electricity cost. I see that on a small scale fren with mining, so I respectfully disagree with you. Hope you have a great New Year!
Cheers, happy new year to you! I just push back on the idea of “100k sats” as a single measure of miner revenue. Block subsidy (new issuance, or “production”) is an entirely separate revenue stream from tx fees. One is known and predictable, where the other is a determined by (volatile) market demand. The cost of producing ~enough hashes (statistically) to find a block is not determined by either form of miner revenue. It is determined by real world hardware/energy/etc costs, and how many hashes competing miners are producing. TLDR; successful miners do a ton of financial and risk modeling for all kinds of scenarios, and invest accordingly.