Oddbean

One could make a distributed philosophical school using Nostr, AI, Blockchain. My whole way of thinking is designed so that others can use what I write in their own works «without explicitly attributing it to me», since my way of writing is principal, meta, original, aphoristic. In the renaissance painters had their colleagues, young people who thus were better initiated in painting by taking advantage of the experience of someone already initiated. But today this can be done much better, in a more planetary and cosmic way, with more independence, respect, and distance between the sorcerer and the sorcerer's apprentice, in a more cosmopolitan way, as Nietzsche said: "meeting in the widest circles". The value in this case (philosophy) is to be able to use a well conceived event (aphorism) in your own world and work, but without having to explicitly attribute it to the one who originated it, since the attribution is given automatically and implicitly, because by using Nostr one has an original relationship with all the rest: in this way one can go much further, we can be more comprehensive and perhaps someday be more cosmic than planetary. Something like this changes everything, and it is part of what is of value in this new expansion of our culture, which among its ramifications, has produced remarkable insights such as those of Satoshi and Fiatjaf. #Nietzsche #Satoshi #Fiatjaf #growNostr #philosophy #nostrphilosophy #AI #Blockchain

Thnx! I should clarify that what you quote is not what I said. More to the Point: for things to work completely, participation is necessary, without participation there is a part that is always missing; in this sense it seems to me that Nostr is a valuable experiment, it allows you to implicitly attribute the origin of a maxim, and allows you to spend less time thanking with words and more time thanking with participation, use, practice; nothing against words, but it seems to me a very interesting experiment to see what happens if one is not «explicitly thanking» for every calorie one ingests, what kind of cultural organism can develop in this way. I am in favor of recognizing how deep our common originality is and how necessary it is to recognize it in its depth so that we can all grow in power without self-destructing. I am completely against plagiarism.

Sounds like justification to our something that is not our to make by fake and corrupt justification. I am? When we have? Nice trying. Now thats hilarious because thieving is thieving. At me to ours is kinda sick and cancerous.