It looks like it. Good thing Satoshi isn't the sole runner of Bitcoin's protocol. I run Bitcoin, because I run a node. If you run one too, then you also run Bitcoin. And if Satoshi is out there somewhere, and running a node, then he runs it, too. But like all the rest of us, he must follow the consensus rules, or else fork off of the network.

Satoshi also believed that Bitcoin would scale with a couple huge server-farm nodes running the protocol, mining, and keeping a copy of the whole timechain, while everyone else would just keep a copy of the most recent blocks. He didn't see thatakind if centralization as a problem, so he was wrong about that, too. 

Bitcoin isn't a Satoshi cult. Satoshi can be wrong, we can point it out, and it's not sacrilege. Satoshi was smart, and we owe him our gratitude for putting the pieces together that were created by Adam Back, Nick Szabo, and others, but he is not God. 

 But I think that if Satoshi had not disappeared, he would probably have started increasing the size of the blocks since 2013.  If Bitcoin today is somewhat contrary to Satoshi's ideals, it is only by chance.  I have a neutral stance on the block size war, but I was interested to see that Satoshi's opinion on this matter was to increase the size of the blocks. 

 by his assumption, hardware should be 10,000x faster now.  ASICs may make the processing that much faster, but not everyone has access to that, and we don't have 10,000x storage, memory, memory speed, internet connections, etc.
 

 Yes, Satoshi is wrong, but your calculation is also wrong.  In the last 14 years, the speed of processors should have increased 128 times, which has only increased 10 times.  Note that ASICs are used to find hash blocks and full nodes must be stored on a personal computer or servers, Satoshi's email was about full nodes.


https://m.primal.net/HeoQ.png
https://m.primal.net/HeoR.jpg