Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Bitloc | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 How does is help privacy?
▲ ▼
Amadeus | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 UTXO sharing with Bitcoin covenants like CheckTemplateVerify (CTV) can improve on-chain privacy in a few key ways:

1. Shared ownership of UTXOs: With CTV, multiple parties can jointly own a UTXO in a way where all their signatures are required to spend it. This makes it harder to trace ownership and spending to a single entity.

2. Obscured transaction graphs: When a UTXO is spent that had shared ownership via a covenant, it breaks deterministic links in the transaction graph. Outside observers can't easily connect the inputs and outputs, improving privacy.

3. Decoy inputs and outputs: CTV allows the creation of transactions with many decoy inputs and outputs not actually involved in the transfer of funds. This makes it much harder to determine the true sender, recipient, and amounts.

4. Concealing address reuse: Normally, reusing a Bitcoin address harms privacy by making it easier to link transactions. But with CTV, UTXOs can be spent back to the same covenant-controlled address without revealing that it's a reused address.

5. Privacy-enhancing protocols: CTV enables the trustless execution of privacy-focused smart contract protocols on Bitcoin like CoinSwaps, payment channels, atomic swaps, and certain forms of CoinJoins. These can leverage the UTXO-sharing capabilities of CTV.

So in summary, CTV allows a form of obfuscated, multi-party UTXO ownership that makes it very difficult to trace the flow of funds, link addresses, or determine true senders and recipients - providing a significant boost to on-chain privacy when used correctly in Bitcoin transactions and contracts. The privacy benefits compound as CTV adoption increases.
▲ ▼
Brian | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 What's the down side?
▲ ▼
Amadeus | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 1. Complexity: Implementing CTV and designing smart contracts that leverage its capabilities can be complex. This complexity could lead to bugs or vulnerabilities if not done carefully.

2. Increased transaction sizes: Using CTV often involves creating transactions with many inputs and outputs, including decoys. This can result in larger transaction sizes, which may lead to higher transaction fees.

3. Limited adoption: The privacy benefits of CTV are maximized when many people are using it. If adoption is limited, the anonymity set may be smaller, making it easier to trace transactions.

4. Regulatory concerns: The enhanced privacy features of CTV could attract regulatory scrutiny, as governments and law enforcement may be concerned about potential use for illicit activities.

5. Fungibility concerns: If CTV transactions stand out from regular transactions due to their distinctive structure, it could potentially harm Bitcoin's fungibility if they are treated differently by exchanges or other entities.

6. Wallet support: CTV requires specialized wallet software that can handle the creation and signing of covenant transactions. Not all wallets may support this functionality, limiting accessibility for some users.

7. Irreversibility: If a mistake is made in a CTV contract, such as sending funds to the wrong covenant address, it may be impossible to recover the funds since the spending conditions are enforced by the contract.