Oddbean

yeah, that thing about likes is a problem the solution would be a negative/positive tag added to kind 7s i think? no point in bothering with changing what is passed i think, but perhaps to give some clear guidance for client devs... having a negative/positive sense to reactions makes a lot of sense but also, at the same time, i think amethyst should consider at least asking first time about this and letting teh user disable this part of the report, or just expose the whole thing in the modal btw, composing this post, coracle froze up on me, and i had to dig around in the console to root out the actual text and remove the automatically added html tags inside it it was because for whatever reason, alby signer had locked my key and refused to sign it

> the solution would be a negative/positive tag added to kind 7s i think? That would just put the burden on the publishing client, the sentiment has to be provided by the user in most cases (heart and thumbs up being probably exceptions). > it was because for whatever reason, alby signer had locked my key and refused to sign it I've experienced this too, nostr:nprofile1qyvhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddakk7um5wgh8q6twdvhsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uqzq2elcsa8ln3q4cfr0zl3dx2nkw27q4w8jf5qgurw2nds3fydqyx9rhygy4 you aware of this?

yeah, i think the thing about putting a weight on the reaction would mean that if the reaction has no weight assigned you don't count it, that's the point i mean, you can't expect everyone else to search for 1984s as well for every single event you fetch??? as always, the most conservative response is usually the best... this is why many of these younger devs especially these javascript ninjas with their woke programming are so irritating, they are so prone to overreacting schemes of logic

> i mean, you can't expect everyone else to search for 1984s as well for every single event you fetch??? Why not? It means something different from a reaction, so if you want to know about them you have to ask about them