Workaround: Search by application number. https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/131/457/722/563/317/original/486d36c390278f21.jpg
And who prosecuted this claim? That would be KAUFHOLD DIX PATENT LAW of Sioux Falls, SD: https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/131/463/079/272/434/original/1db72eea7d051e00.jpg
Unlike most design patents, this one faced a non-final rejection on its path to issuance. Like many design patents that do get rejections, this one was based on § 112: https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/131/477/049/626/116/original/06c7f67908213720.jpg
The examiner also suggested some clarification to the descriptions of the drawings: https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/131/484/067/262/360/original/38020674b482a4d5.jpg