Satoshi said it dude. You're just quoting it out of acute self-righteoussness and appeal to authority.

And the follow up with a suoer defensive "ackqually I do real cypherpunk shit"

Now.
More Michael Saylor normie hodlers means more ass kissing to tradfi and seeking approval from the legacy system.
The legacy system WILL NOT ACCEPT bitcoin as censorship' resistant.
For example
Heres Andreas on why bitcoin ETFs are a bad idea. He says a lot in a few minutes, as always.

I'm all for new users and increased purchasing power. But NOT institutions aligned with tradfi or custodians.

You new bitcoiners who think any and all raw adoption is a net benefit do NOT recognize ro downplay the danger of regulatory capture of the network. Which is already happening.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSv0J4bfBCc 

 You called my quote and appeal to authority and then immediately appealed to authority with Andreas.... 

 No.
I provided a informational video rather then type a bunch of shit out.

Quite different than your use of a satoshi quote to make outright dismissal without any debate sound cool 

 You're right it is quite different. I used a quote because it fit in the context. You actually appealed to authority... I did make a debate. All you've done is appeal to authority. I made two points. All you've said is you don't like rich people in Bitcoin, and that's somehow decreases its censorship resistance. Seems to me like you're a 💩 coiner, who doesn't actually run a node. If you did you would understand how Bitcoin actually worked, and why what you're saying makes no sense.