Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Luke Dashjr | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +8 
 It's worth noting you still can configure the limit however you want in Knots. This fix just means it will actually honour your choice.
▲ ▼
Elephant in the root | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I would like those two limits to be separate.
▲ ▼
Cyber Seagull | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Plot twist. I was missing something. Fix is good.

nostr:nevent1qqs2fpcdf0f73vypysyeywhrpdnek0sqxstprhvcvl0dtpwmf84xxvspremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59upzplw4arm2urdcz7lqkuw6ypyccxqxj6xc5eze2kwzf8ej97nnge98qvzqqqqqqykk0lca
▲ ▼
Cyber Seagull | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 nostr:nevent1qqs2fpcdf0f73vypysyeywhrpdnek0sqxstprhvcvl0dtpwmf84xxvspremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59upzplw4arm2urdcz7lqkuw6ypyccxqxj6xc5eze2kwzf8ej97nnge98qvzqqqqqqykk0lca
▲ ▼
Cyber Seagull | 11 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Based on discussion about it and not actually having looked at the code yet, it gives more control to the individual, something you should be for given your values.  

If the premise is true, that an individual nodes carry limit can be ignored, this is forced association.

The size can also be adjusted back to the larger, inscription accepting size.

Basing my conclusion on this:

nostr:nevent1qqs2fpcdf0f73vypysyeywhrpdnek0sqxstprhvcvl0dtpwmf84xxvspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsyg8a6h50dtsdhqtmuzm3mgsynrqcq6tgmznyt92ecfylxgh6wdry5upsgqqqqqqstupe6q