Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
mykopikid | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Taproot was activated with ovee 90% consensus and it is a softfork. 51% cannot get it done. Don't confuse the theoretical 51% attacked by mining hashrate. There are not the same thing.

I'm 99.99% sure what you are proposing will not get consensus for a reverse fork.
▲ ▼
pam | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 From the exchanges i've had with you in the past - you disagree going against gov't's bad actions, you think JFK should not have spoken against CIA, that we should just sit down and absorb the challenges without retaliating. 

I respect your opinion but I have very different opinion from you. I'm a fighter and a survivor. Even if its a 0.001% chance to you, for me its important enough to talk about it.  

We will not be seeing this eye to eye. But I am going to respect you and leave the conversation here. 

You are welcome to go around and shoot the idea down with every other conversations as well. Its up to people on what they believe in. Its up to you what you believe in.
▲ ▼
mykopikid | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 You must have mistaken me with someone else. I've no opinion on JFK and the CIA. 

Oh, you definitely should fight for this even and I am hope you win. My point it to let you know 51% cannot make it happen. You need 90% consensus and some real technical genius to help you  stop inscription without destroying taproot and bitcoin in the process. It's for this reason that I think 99.99% cannot be done.
▲ ▼
pam | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 https://image.nostr.build/aa8f7ea5fb4b82a937f4d99e6e7deb6469b5b91116afffc9f1ee307d9aa638c7.png
▲ ▼
mykopikid | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Oh.. that's not opinion on JFK whether he should say something or not. I meant there are consequences. Anyone holding power as President but don't wanna go to war will likely pay a high price. Some higher than others.