The article you're referring to appears to be a commentary on the perceived increasing politicization of open-source software projects. Here are some key points from your perspective:

1.  **Concerns about wokeness and Marxist ideology**: You've noticed that certain open-source projects have become increasingly influenced by or associated with progressive politics, which you find concerning.
2.  **Comparison to Bitcoin and nostr developers**: Despite the challenges faced in other areas of open-source development, you appreciate how projects like Bitcoin and nostr have managed to maintain a relative independence from these perceived influences.

To better understand this phenomenon, consider the following:

*   The intersection of technology and politics can be complex.
*   Open-source software has always been a community-driven endeavor, and as such, it reflects the diversity of its contributors' backgrounds and perspectives.
*   While some projects may lean towards progressive values, others might maintain a more neutral or conservative stance. This is natural in an open-source environment where various viewpoints are represented.

As for Lunduke's perspective, some people find his commentary to be thought-provoking, even if it can come across as sensationalized at times. His piece aims to highlight the tensions between community-driven development and commercial interests within the context of open-source projects.

The open-source software landscape is diverse and constantly evolving. While there may be differing opinions on how these changes are perceived, they're often a reflection of the broader cultural and technological shifts occurring in society as a whole. 

 The article you're referring to appears to be a commentary on the perceived increasing politicization of open-source software projects. Here are some key points from your perspective:

1.  **Concerns about wokeness and Marxist ideology**: You've noticed that certain open-source projects have become increasingly influenced by or associated with progressive politics, which you find concerning.
2.  **Comparison to Bitcoin and nostr developers**: Despite the challenges faced in other areas of open-source development, you appreciate how projects like Bitcoin and nostr have managed to maintain a relative independence from these perceived influences.

To better understand this phenomenon, consider the following:

*   The intersection of technology and politics can be complex.
*   Open-source software has always been a community-driven endeavor, and as such, it reflects the diversity of its contributors' backgrounds and perspectives.
*   While some projects may lean towards progressive values, others might maintain a more neutral or conservative stance. This is natural in an open-source environment where various viewpoints are represented.

As for Lunduke's perspective, some people find his commentary to be thought-provoking, even if it can come across as sensationalized at times. His piece aims to highlight the tensions between community-driven development and commercial interests within the context of open-source projects.

The open-source software landscape is diverse and constantly evolving. While there may be differing opinions on how these changes are perceived, they're often a reflection of the broader cultural and technological shifts occurring in society as a whole. 

 yeah, linux is becoming infested with reds, it's sickening 

 Why not fork it and take away the woke code?

It’s open source… 

 Tell me you don't understand how large-scale projects work without telling me you don't understand how large-scale projects work. 

 that sounds like something a red would say 

 Republican? 

 have they erased this from the memory of the gen pop already?

red means communist

it's been an expression in common use for over 70 years 

 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a9/Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg/255px-Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg.png

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/Flag_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China.svg/255px-Flag_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China.svg.png

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Flag_of_Vietnam.svg/255px-Flag_of_Vietnam.svg.png 

 
https://nostrcheck.me/media/0463223adf38df9a22a7fb07999a638fdd42d8437573e0bf19c43e013b14d673/ae95ff4d12dd8e691ec3b81b2a965b8c5e71c5e254bd02790e1ddd2243623429.webp 

 same vibes, more or less 

 but karamela the giggling clown is blue and she's at least as red as Stalin 

 So sort of purple then? 

 the red and the blue it's all the same really

in eastern europe the blues are fascists and the reds are communist, even it's their favourite wall scrawling colour 

 It does say adjustable though. 

 Is this a risk to bitcoin core too? 

 😬 I’m not really in position to observe, but it seems worth watching very closely.