Oddbean

We have many examples of greatness amongst Catholic women through history. People nowadays are just brushing it aside because it is not about being a slave to the wage style of life. Oh, the tragedy. As if all the degeneracy promoted by feminism was something to be proud of. Single mothers, like mine, are something to be avoided, not withstanding while women actually get away from their virtues to be the family's heart.

There have been powerful women throughout the ages and there are now even within authoritarian states that likely yield significant power. For example, Kim Yo Jong, sister of North Korean leader, is on the nation’s top ruling body. For the West and in recent times, it was about universal suffrage and the idea that everyone should have a say. The fact feminism is still around today does raise questions. Equal opportunity already has been obtained so what is the fuss about now unless it is for equal outcomes, which is in effect communism.

See? Stella and I gave you example of virtuous women who, through their own greatness, saved their loved men's souls. You have brought the atheist Korean dictator's sister who is a product of her brother. Your mind has strange models of greatness. That is the result of your corrupted education. Degeneracy is greatness to you.

The point was that women in all societies achieve great power, but that does not necessarily extend to all women. It is only in recent history where the common women has achieved equal treatment under the law, the vote.

Again, you are referring to great power as authority level and material goods ownership. A Catholic model of family was the model for the plebeians as much as for the royalty. Any family member would seek to be each other's support and the Catholic women, to this day in our contemporaneity, go out of their way for their husbands and children. What worth is a woman whose authority os used to crush others and fulfill her own degeneracy? Your view of power is distorted. A woman in her family taking care of the house has been the greatest and best power all plebeians and royalty women ever held. And only they could and still can do that.

I blame protestantism for feminism. Without Virgin Mary venerated as Mater Dei, as Mater Misericordae, as well as other Saints and devout women from the caliber of Joan of Arc, Lady Godiva, St Genevieve, etc etc. Without that, women have not their rightful place anymore, which is something that contributed to the rise of feminism. Protestantism robbed women from their spiritual place and left them as a prey to feminism and other forces of Satan.

Oof. I don't think you understand how much this kind of topic still rages on within much of protestantism itself today, at least the branches that haven't gone completely fruity. But also, mainstream feminism stems from a few pricks who wanted women working and out of the home to increase factory production, increase taxes, and lessen the surity of the foundations of home and hearth, thus making all people more easy to manipulate. I don't think that you can actually make the case that it was primarily protestantism that directly lead to the cancer that is feminism.

Would’ve been a few aligned interested parties, but at the end of the day it only means freedom of choice. More corrosive is the welfare state lowering the reason for a man and women to be together, she could always ‘marry’ the state. My view is the welfare state has to go. Leave charity to the churches.

Exorcizamus te, omnis immundus spiritus, omnis satanica potestas, omnis incursio infernalis adversarii, omnis legio, omnis congregatio et secta diabolica. Ergo, omnis legio diabolica, adiuramus te…cessa decipere humanas creaturas, eisque æternæ perditionìs venenum propinare…Vade, satana, inventor et magister omnis fallaciæ, hostis humanæ salutis…Humiliare sub potenti manu Dei; contremisce et effuge, invocato a nobis sancto et terribili nomine…quem inferi tremunt…Ab insidiis diaboli, libera nos, Domine. Ut Ecclesiam tuam secura tibi facias libertate servire, te rogamus, audi nos.