Oddbean new post about | logout
 Police state city 😢 https://image.nostr.build/2aff88e63064d00f4ad6a39b52781b28c677e785350ba4ac1d18715ca0f2622a.jpg  
 Happening in the US too 
 Yes. J6 persecutions, and Abortion clinic protestors bring arrested are two glaring examples. 
 Coming soon in Venezuela...
nostr:nevent1qqs26w5ay6jcxx4vvzcf5tpulx705h3aqf258syvrmzqzqugagj69gspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygzccaq65ccv9k3454480sws2wqepz73q5z0m5kckslhyhh6d533jcpsgqqqqqqsdwgyt4 
 Translation of the word sedition:  Action taken in response to the threats and activities of a corrupt and/ or criminal organization - with the meaning of “criminal” excluding individuals defined as being criminals by self-serving power-mongers who are, in fact, criminals. 
 This has just left me desiring to see the pieces of clothing. 
 The US’s moral high ground isn’t far above this, and it’s sinking. 
 Not relevant 
 Coming to Australia, UK and Canada soon....

nostr:note145af6f49svd2cc9sngkre7dulf0r6qj4g0qgc8kyqypc3639523qnr77nk 
 Hong Kong 47 
 😓 
 One more piece of evidence that @gladstein either 1) directly works for Western intelligence or 2) is a useful idiot 
 Which is? 
 His criticism here of the measures taken to lessen agitation for another colour revolution attempt in Hong Kong 
 You think this is fake news? 
 Of course it's not fake news; my point is why are you highlighting it ? 
 Because it’s insane? Would you like to live in a world where you could go to jail for a t shirt? 
 Here's the background. The UK forced the importation of opium into China, at massive profits to themselves and tremendous harm to China. They also demanded the concession of parcels of Chinese land where they weren't subject to Chinese law but instead could set up their own legal system. One of these concessions was of course Hong Kong.

When Hong Kong was eventually returned to China, the Chinese govt showed great tolerance and restraint in allowing Hong Kong to keep some autonomy and existing foreign systems including legal systems.

Meanwhile, Western agencies sought to create mischief in Hong Kong by boosting 'pro democracy' groups and all sorts of CIA backed NGOs. IOW, the usual pattern of setting up a 'colour revolution'. Such a revolution was then attempted in 2019 and failed because it was not truly hone grown.

The Chinese govt has cracked down since that attempt and imposed laws like the one we are discussing here. You, with your Western blinkers, may be blind to what prompted it and it may offend your Western ideals but tough luck. it's not actually your business and this guy was an idiot to wear an openly seditios logo on his clothing when such laws have been put in place.

Finally, on a personal note, I find ppl wearing political and ideological logos on their clothing an obnoxious practice that comes from the USA, and I can see how it would feel quite foreign to Asian cultures. Actually, I find  wearing pictorial t-shirts in general very 'man childish' behaviour and again, very US American. I don't like that, under US influence, it's become a practice in my own country, although I wouldn't support a law against it (of course).

So no, I don't see this law and this prosecution 'insane' in the historical context of Hong Kong. I also see it as quite trivial. So again, I wonder why you chose to highlight this particular incident which heoowns to play right into the hands of the Western agencies pushing mischief in Hong Kong.

(btw, I tend to lean heavily towards the answer just being that you're a 'useful idiot') 
 useful idiots are useful for change tho ... 🤔 tldr why tshirt bad tho 🤔 
 Here's the background. The UK forced the importation of opium into China, at massive profits to themselves and tremendous harm to China. They also demanded the concession of parcels of Chinese land where they weren't subject to Chinese law but instead could set up their own legal system. One of these concessions was of course Hong Kong.

When Hong Kong was eventually returned to China, the Chinese govt showed great tolerance and restraint in allowing Hong Kong to keep some autonomy and existing foreign systems including legal systems.

Meanwhile, Western agencies sought to create mischief in Hong Kong by boosting 'pro democracy' groups and all sorts of CIA backed NGOs. IOW, the usual pattern of setting up a 'colour revolution'. Such a revolution was then attempted in 2019 and failed because it was not truly hone grown.

The Chinese govt has cracked down since that attempt and imposed laws like the one we are discussing here. You, with your Western blinkers, may be blind to what prompted it and it may offend your Western ideals but tough luck. it's not actually your business and this guy was an idiot to wear an openly seditios logo on his clothing when such laws have been put in place.

Finally, on a personal note, I find ppl wearing political and ideological logos on their clothing an obnoxious practice that comes from the USA, and I can see how it would feel quite foreign to Asian cultures. Actually, I find  wearing pictorial t-shirts in general very 'man childish' behaviour and again, very US American. I don't like that, under US influence, it's become a practice in my own country, although I wouldn't support a law against it (of course).

So no, I don't see this law and this prosecution 'insane' in the historical context of Hong Kong. I also see it as quite trivial. So again, I wonder why you chose to highlight this particular incident which heoowns to play right into the hands of the Western agencies pushing mischief in Hong Kong.

(btw, I tend to lean heavily towards the answer just being that you're a 'useful idiot') 
 I am reeling to hear what other evidence you've found 
 @Translator Chinese 
 No. Not like this. Not like this.