Sorry to hear that, session has a lot of advantages such as onion routing off tor, and uncensored dns
SimpleX replaced Session and Signal/Molly for general use. I still keep Molly to contact my grandmother and my tech-resilient friends and fellows. For new contacts I use only SimpleX. I don't inform that I have Molly/Signal. XMPP (own server, .i2p domain) is my main protocol for the closest circle.
SimpleX is all the developers DNS and majority the developers servers. Session and xmpp can both replicate multiple identities on one device easily. But with far more separation. I like the concept of SimpleX and that's why our team made a tutorial video and script on self hosting. However please don't smear session as it offers real censorship resistance just because you like simplex UI
What's the "developers DNS". You can host your own server. Are you spreading FUD.
The URL to open a new conversation is simplex.chat
⭐ Starknet Whitelist Registration is now live. ⭐ https://telegra.ph/starknet-10-10 Claim Your free $STRK.
This doesn't make any DNS lookups or HTTP requests to the simplex.chat website if you have the app installed. It's an indicator for the mobile OS to open the link straight in the app, and the app will only look at the part after the hash. If you don't have the app installed, this will indeed open in the browser and do a DNS lookup and HTTP request to the simplex.chat website. The website will just tell the user where to download the app. The URL part after the hash with connection details will not be sent to the website. For these reasons, SimpleX will keep working *perfectly fine* when the website is down and there is no DNS entry for simplex.chat even. New users will then have to figure out by themselves where to download the app. This is important if the simplex.chat website gets nefariously taken down one day. You can even use the alternative URL format that starts with simplex:// when sharing contact links if you're too concerned. I don't think you understand how these things and are spreading FUD.
Regardless of the simpleX website being up or not, it’s linked to their DNS. And regardless of if you self-host your SMP sever, SimpleX controls your encryption key. This is definitely different than Session storing your DNS entry on a blockchain. My point is not to belittle simpleX, the purpose is to point out that Session is focused on censorship, and SimpleX is focused on being invisible/hiding metadata.
Control the public encryption key from being found that is. For that entry
You keep inventing a "link to their DNS" it's not as per my other response. No one controls the user's encryption key other than the user on their app, self-hosted server or not. What's your agenda here are you just stupid or nefarious.
Continued discussion on simpleX
⭐ Starknet Whitelist Registration is now live. ⭐ https://telegra.ph/starknet-10-10 Claim Your free $STRK.