Thanks for the explanation, Sjors! I was wondering: why don’t you join my show to explain why Bitcoin doesn’t have better privacy to provide fungibility to the monetary asset?

Or better yet, explain why nothing out there (including Zcash’s Halo2 and MWEB) is good enough for Bitcoin. So that nobody ever assumes negligence or malevolence when it comes to protocol development, granted that the reasons are purely technical. 

 > why don’t you join my show

Because of your behavior. 

 And also because I don't have time to study, for you and for free, a dozen protocols to figure out what trade-offs their marketing team isn't talking about that make it unsuitable for Bitcoin.

That's not to say there's never something useful out there. Information does make it across, e.g. because developers talk to each other - less so through public debates.