Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
John Train | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @97954ff7 "It's not something to be dismissed regardless of the actual truth, if he's trying to tell the truth."

He thought he had been enlightened to the evils of the "catholic" manuscripts used on the NASB. That's all a lie, but he just didn't know better.
▲ ▼
clk [new york, new york, NY] | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @f0140f36 Still not something to be dismissed even if he was wrong.

Now on the Catholic part, I didn't know that as I don't know this story indepth (which is why I've relied on your direction). Are you sure the Catholic part wasn't true?
▲ ▼
John Train | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 @97954ff7 KJV guys slander Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus as being "catholic" manuscripts, and therefore corrupt. They were written well before the Rome of today with all its trappings ever existed. It's a poor attempt at the genetic fallacy.
▲ ▼
John Train | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 @97954ff7 There's a difference between dismissing an argument and refuting it. KJV Onlyism has no legs to stand on if you take a minute to think about what they're saying.