The difference is one is people dissociating with you because they don't like you, the other is people locking you in a cage and killing you if you try to leave. Also, people cancelling you has literally zero to do with the constitution, so bringing it up in this context is a non sequitur.

The government using their enforcement arms to make your life miserable is actually illegal, which means there is an avenue of recourse available to you that other states don't offer because they don't have things like the first, fourth, and eighth amendments.

If you're going to come at this from the perspective "The state is bad and there is nothing left to talk about." Fine. You can have that position, but if you're going to try and say that, in the context of existing states, the Constitution doesn't make America qualitatively different than European states, then you're just wrong. It's a libertarian contrarian position that avoids answering hard questions about the structures of states while pretending to be above it all. 

 I didn't say the constitution in some sense doesn't make us difference, I'm saying it has no power to stop people from ignoring it and doing illegal things. And there really isn't a way to hold those people accountable for ignoring it when they do. Congress doesn't do anything. SCOTUS can only rule and not enforce. POTUS is where most of the offenses are happening. There are still people rotting in jail for Jan 6 who haven't been charged with crimes.

The Constitution is meaningless if our beloved and sacred institutions refuse to recognize it and the people who care about it are too weak to confront them. 

 Are you mad that laws aren't self-enforcing? 

 No. I'm mad that no one cares enough about the Constitution to stop the bureaucratic state from harassing US citizens. Congressional committees are there now to protect the BS instead of representing us. 

 I mean, one of the primary components of a former and possibly repeat president's message to voters has been the danger of the deep state. Something like half of the country is at least not opposed to this idea to such a degree that they'd vote against him for saying it and many support him because he does say it.

Idk, maybe I'm not totally blackpilled, but the fact that we have the kind of opposition to this in America that frankly just doesn't exist in Europe, is primarily due to our robust free speech protections. And we have an economic system that offers a single person with a particular value set to straight up buy one of the most popular social media platforms just to prevent it from censoring people's speech.

Granted, he isn't perfect about it, but it did happen. It happened in America. 

 I guess I don't see enough of what's happening in Europe or assume it's all done at the orders of the American deep state in their effort to achieve comprehensive influence.