Here is why the governments of Europe allow uncontrolled immigration, to keep the pyramid pension system afloat.
Meanwhile the ordinary European suffers robberies, murders and rapes.
A country is the private property of its inhabitants, contrary to what some false libertarians say, there is nothing more communist than open borders.
And this uncontrolled immigration also violates the principles of natural law, private ownership of land is obtained through a process known as “original appropriation” or “principle of first occupation”.
It is the inhabitants of the country who have to decide if they need foreigners to work in their companies, who have to decide if they need foreigners to sell them their houses, to rent them or simply to step on their lands, as Hans-Hermann Hoppe explained so well. This should not be decided by politicians and even less on the basis of obscure plans, Hoppe argued that in the absence of the state, private communities could exclude those they considered detrimental to their interests.
Open borders are for globalists and it is precisely globalists who do not defend private property.
https://image.nostr.build/c368c6fb377cd6bf4f8088f99b0f9ad9502942b4aee352ca7c0d3158e34e38e9.jpg
nostr:note1kn42y93cgcvj7zqzacfalfkmjppl8n7gs8qeugy3tx5z2f039a5sdhwwy3
Physical removal of all invaders!
How are you going to keep social security and pensions afloat if you give the money that should go to your elders to migrants?
It's not like they're paying into social security
It is a good point, but in the heads of politicians it seems wonderful, it has already been seen in France that it has not worked.
You are assuming it wasn't immediately stolen & used for pet projects to begin with...
There is no separate bank account with that money sitting there, there should be but never was.
And to answer the question, they can't & don't give a shit.
Europeans, the Spanish in particular, are finding "immigration" difficult.
So coming on boats to prospect land isn't supported by the natives? Who would've thunk?
History and it's irony.
nostr:nevent1qqs9p0ytrjg3g7t4835elh4hr8n0xd90rtk3k4rehssa4eycp956vzspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsyg8u7u9ytnagzl42syaeh29rwht385ckna9z0u7u4s75jyfd7e7n0cpsgqqqqqqsqt58cq
So you are against the government and state but with closed boarders? 🤔
From a middle eastern point of view, borders are a modern colonial invention. People shouldn't be stopped from going here or there depending the whims of politicians or origin stories invented by colonizers to create fake lines on sand.
Arabs were always free to roam wide expanses of land with nothing to stop them except ostracization of a particular group. Even then there was this "ijara" system in which any member of the community could protect anyone from physical or verbal abuse. And any attack on the protected is considered an attack against the protector and his clan.
If I am not welcome in one town, I should be able to go another town wherever it is. Yes, ostracization is indeed needed to keep communities safe, but at the same time the ostracized should be able to travel and establish themselves elsewhere. In this case, borders might stop them from doing that.
I'm all for open borders between the Arab states, but the hell to all communists. Those two ideas can be separated. At least in our Arab context. European context is obviously different.
I always appreciate Arab points of view. Your culture is more resilient than ours, you still preserve values that we westerners have lost.
🤔
The newer residents will look after the pensioners
🫣
https://m.primal.net/KfSX.png
How so many people, who talk about "improving domestic business" as a remedy for a faltering economy, don't seem to understand the essential difference between sectors (like manufacturing) that are absolutely necessary to access any kind of foreign goods/services and other sectors that do nothing in that regard (like health care), is beyond me.
Oddbean new post about login | logout 
