This debate has so far been an outstanding example of how to disagree, argue the points, seek to persuade, and still stay respectful towards your opponent. It's refreshing to see.
Imagine a world class security expert but his words were coarse. But he was a master at his craft and has extreme skills. But he is an asshole.
Then you have a couple of nice people but they can barely turn on a computer.
Who would you want as your security administrator for your company?
Your dialog leads me to believe you would pick one of the nice people who doesn’t know how to turn on a computer.
Decent analogy. What you’re missing is the real issue of people accepting the asshole has any skills whatsoever and without checking the record of failures.
I don’t believe the lies the media tries to portray.
What lies? What media? I never mentioned any. Just pure observation. Should I not believe my eyes and ears Mr. Orwell?
World class security expert? 🤣🤣🤣
You do realize they exist outside of computers? Right?
Why are the options a competent asshole and an incompetent people pleaser? I obviously wouldn't hire either.
It has been refreshing but also a complete waste of time.