Full verdict: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2024:2069 

 I don't know if it's because of the translation quality, but this looks like it was written by a 12 year old, not by a judge.
nostr:nevent1qqs90n4qgkkf83a69r7tzyspw7px8j9cx57z7jmtt9txdtqj3sztmtgpgdmhxw309amkjmn9ve5kcar9wfkksutf0pu85mtw0fuxsundv96kvurwvecnxunddf3kcdn9dy6r26tex3skjerjdenhqumed9jzummwd9hkuq3qs6z7hmmx2vud66f3utxd70qem8cwtggx0jgc7gh8pqwz2k8cltuqxpqqqqqqz64nsn6 

 dutchdouche 

 Now see, if he'd earned enough from this scheme he'd have been able to pay someone to lock the judge attacking him in a cage for as long as he was locked up. 

nostr:nevent1qqs90n4qgkkf83a69r7tzyspw7px8j9cx57z7jmtt9txdtqj3sztmtgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyzrgt6l0vefn3htfx83veheur8vlpedpqe7frrezuuypcf2clra0sqcyqqqqqqg4ms7tw 

 I realise you're not a lawyer but, any sense of how this judgement might have the potential to affect other judgements in the EU (or even perhaps outside it)? 

 Now do banks  

 Thanks for sharing

Court is contradicting themselves here in paragraph 6, sentences 1-2. 

Embarrassing 

 Fiat judicial. Nothing to see here. 

 Wasn't the dutch gov that started implementing the travel rules years in advance? Do they have a particularly militant financial enforcer or are they like a test country to see what financial surveillance people will tolerate before its rolled out across the EU? 

 There's another clear reason why Alexey Pertsev needed to be jailed and his assets seized.
🇷🇺⚖️🇪🇺

https://image.nostr.build/75ba6dca97d2b9fea5368624b2f8ab29f4eebe1b8fb71bf161c22d6c536cf639.jpg 

 nostr:nevent1qqs90n4qgkkf83a69r7tzyspw7px8j9cx57z7jmtt9txdtqj3sztmtgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzyzrgt6l0vefn3htfx83veheur8vlpedpqe7frrezuuypcf2clra0sqcyqqqqqqg4ms7tw

nostr:nevent1qqs905e7zmv92nlu442xf25xz3ppjdyp8e0wnwl96gk2g32ldm8pptspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzqnphlr2jt4azu3gqcqwsgewzxc0zj0uq4rd769za3zaxr8dfxdruqvzqqqqqqys9sxj5