Oddbean new post about login | logout By the way, apparently the 42 limit standard is his version, not cores. The standard he's talking about is his series of patches he has been advocating for merging to core for several years. Not so much lying, as being zealous. This distinction might be damage control though.
There isn't a Luke standard and a Laser standard and then finally a #Bitcoin standard. There is only 1 #Bitcoin network and the standard is based on the implicit/explicit contracts of that network, not Luke's fork. "Luke often is correct, but sometimes only with a non-standard definition." -Adam Back https://nitter.net/adam3us/status/1733098596122198306 "80 bytes is standard policy on the network" -Adam Back https://nitter.net/adam3us/status/1733409334577541162?s=20 "Samourai has no obligation of any kind to 'fix', they're using network standard..." -Adam Back https://nitter.net/adam3us/status/1733409758508367972
You have the right to join a pool or run a node that does what you want it to. He claims in the current core implementation, limiting the byte size can be bypassed, and is, by ordinals. Knots has a fix for this apparently, that follows the strict byte limit. This limit can be adjusted back to 80 if you want, by the way. Along with several other fixes in Knots, changes and weaknesess he sees in core, he is self advocating for these changes to be merged to core. if there is a lie, the lie is that reducing the byte size in a core implementation can be bypassed somehow. Haven't seen the fix code. But nothing so far counters that specific claim.