wake up babe, we got some constructive criticism to address π nostr:note1jmav6c840xj2fkzlsjw9c984wvmms422a4mplremq8ga3audjqls9kuagf
Request denied π
is nostr HR closed today ? π€£
Nostr CEO laid off the HR department π
Damn @Jeroen β thatβs kinda based of you π€£
Level of criticism is inversely proportional to the amount of push-ups done ππ«‘
π΄ Same 'ol BS I offer cheese to the whine
I never heard that before π i like ittt
Followed
I think this hurts because itβs true. Good software takes a lot of time and effort. Needs to be able to financially sustain itself so it can go the distance. Thereβs just not enough funding so we have a lot of half-complete hobby projects.
Thatβs cause majority of it is a hobby devs use nostr as a playground only those with grants can afford to do it full-time
And those who do it full time have been doing great
100% specially for the size of the teams
Agreed. Iβm very grateful to those putting in the work, with or without funding. At this stage, I think itβs more important we tinker and discover new use cases than make polished copycats of things that already exist. But if the goal is mass adoption, user experience will be most important.
I like how everyone takes a different approach to building on nostr some will make those copycat clones, and others like Pablo make brand new things that hadnβt existed.. arkinox is one of those devs like Pablo building something that doesnβt exist outside of nostr.. I think the goal of mass adoption will be by individual clients, not by the protocol as a whole n all of the micro apps, those clients whose goal that is will def have to prioritize user experience like you say.
People have been lowkey noting about this all day.
Iβve seen it everywhere π she sure knows how to make the timeline active