NIP-65 is likely enough and I agree that it is going to take at least 30 years to replace DNS, but Nostr could serve as the test ground for pubky. If you can host all Nostr events via pubky records, faster than what relays can do, then Nostr gets better and pubky gets the testing station that it desperately needs to take on the bigger system.
Then it just means that you are in the pre-seed stage. You are just playing with money with no regard for it. Anyone that has even grown anything knows that growth is all about proving you can do the next step over and over again. In my eyes, you have a LOT to prove. You talk a big game but talk is cheap. And these days even code is cheap. Demo apps are not proof of anything. > Web servers need proofing? You are not proving Web servers, you are proving your pitch. You are not pitching Web servers. Those are already out there and have already been proven. You are pitching a very specific use of Web servers. That must be proved it not only works but that there is nothing better that can easily replace it.
you went a step far, things don't prove the absence of theoretical better alternatives. but I always appreciate being called out to my face. I wonder what of the combination of Pkarr and web servers for hosting data seems to be the most vulnerable? it would be very helpful for more experienced developers to tell me "this where you will probably fail", since if they turned out right, they win, if I did a good job, then it's thanks to their heads up.
This is correct, even when one makes the most conservative bet they can think of, they still have to build the thing. For the record, I am never asking anyone to build stuff for me, or use my work, I only aim to explain what IS. What you ought to do is whatever the hell you want really. nostr:note1t3d7wnxs8vdrzj4vquyg0lhszrwm0jcntzza37k2jz0tcnq5thuqsgvrta
is pubky your work? I thought it was from the synonym team, but you designed it yourself?
is pubky your work? I thought it was from the synonym team, but you designed it yourself?