nope, only spotify gets the rights.
Of course, what I meant was that she's describing how open source licenses work in general. 😉
That's like talking to a car mechanic and saying "wow you're describing a bicycle" on the basis that they both have wheels.
What I noticed is that what she's describing as something bad is what I'd actually want from a Creative Commons or Foss license. - Free to use and distribute - Others can change and adapt my work - They can use part of it to make something else Seeing those statements as "stealing" your work is just weird to me. Like publishing on YouTube and complaining that other can see and share your videos without permission. At least that's how I understood it.