**China's Spy Balloon Program Appears to Have Been Suspended, US Officials Say**
An anonymous reader shared this report from CNN:
China appears to have suspended its surveillance balloon program following a major diplomatic incident earlier this year, when one of the country's high-altitude spy balloons transited the United States, multiple sources familiar with US intelligence assessments told CNN. US officials believe that Chinese leaders have made a deliberate decision not to launch additional balloons since the one over the US was shot down by American fighter jets in February, the sources said. The US has not observed any new launches since the episode occurred... The US intelligence community believes that Chinese Communist Party leaders did not intend for the balloon to cross over the United States, and even reprimanded the operators of the surveillance program over the incident, one of the sources said...
The US assessed at the time that the spy balloon was part of an extensive surveillance program run by the Chinese military, CNN has previously reported. The balloon fleet had conducted at least two dozen missions over at least five continents in recent years, according to US officials. The suspension of the program is likely China's way of trying to stabilize its relations with the United States in the run-up to a potential meeting between President Biden and Xi in November at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in San Francisco, said Christopher Johnson, a former senior China analyst at the CIA and now a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Although China is unlikely to publicly acknowledge that the balloon was part of an espionage program or announce it will no longer conduct such surveillance on the United States, Johnson said, quietly suspending the program is "a positive step" and likely Beijing's way of showing the US it is trying to address some of the friction points in the relationship...
The FBI concluded its analysis of the balloon's remnants earlier this year, and the Pentagon announced in June that the US government assessed that the balloon did not collect intelligence while flying over the country...In the wake of the incident, the US widened the aperture of its radar systems so that they could better detect objects traveling above a certain altitude and at certain speeds. The aim was to fix a "domain awareness gap" that had allowed three other suspected Chinese spy balloons to transit the continental United States undetected under the Trump administration, Gen. Glen VanHerck, commander of US Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command, said at the time. The more sensitive radar systems led the US military to spot more unidentified objects in US airspace, however, leading to three additional shootdowns of unidentified high-altitude objects in the weeks following the Chinese balloon incident.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=China's+Spy+Balloon+Program+Appears+to+Have+Been+Suspended%2C+US+Officials+Say%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F2242228%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F2242228%2Fchinas-spy-balloon-program-appears-to-have-been-suspended-us-officials-say%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/2242228/chinas-spy-balloon-program-appears-to-have-been-suspended-us-officials-say?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/2242228/chinas-spy-balloon-program-appears-to-have-been-suspended-us-officials-say?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**'Feedback' Is Now Too Harsh. The New Word is 'Feedforward'**
The Wall Street Journal reports that more companies are phasing out "feedback" bosses give to workers — and replacing it with "feedforward."
"The idea is that 'feedforward' gives people less anxiety," the Journal's reporter said in a video interview. "It's a little bit gentler. When people hear 'feedback', they think immediately, 'What have I done wrong? What are the bad things my boss is going to tell me to fix?'"
And another reason that we're hearing "feedforward" at these companies over and over is employees are younger. Younger employees make up a larger percentage of the workforce today, and a number of experts with whom we spoke said that younger employees are more comfortable with gentler terms like "feedforward"...
Q: So they're trying to appeal to the younger employees who are sensitive to harsher reviews, feedback or criticism. But do the employees need to learn how to better receive this type of constructive criticism, regardless of what you call it?
A: Some experts say that younger employees do need to be prepared for negative feedback. And just the rebranding or replacing of a word could have a negative effect, and perhaps managers won't be as comfortable providing negative feedback if they're just thinking about this as a way to tell an employee what they've done well...
Certain companies are really revamping their entire review process, trying to make it so that employees and managers are more communicative and really addressing any issues or concerns, so that they can work more productively. In some cases if companies are just rebranding "feedback" with "feedforward" or other terms, people with whom I spoke were concerned that this is just a hollow effort.
And there is a possibility that younger generations won't learn about what they're doing wrong and how to improve... \[W\]e did speak with an expert who said that baby boomers learned to suck it up and perform. And this trend really is generational.
From the Journal's article:
At Microsoft, managers are encouraged to use the word "perspectives" instead of traditional feedback, according to current and former employees. Reviews, meanwhile, have been branded as "connect" conversations. The company also recently stopped including anonymous comments from peers in employee reviews, instead showing the names of the colleagues in question... Jennifer Solomon-Baum, a former Microsoft marketing director who left early this year, says she understands why the company chose to rethink its approach to feedback, which she feels may have made employees more open to giving feedback. On the other hand, she says Microsoft's recent decision to put an end to anonymous peer feedback in reviews completely backfired. In the wake of the change, "we didn't get the richness of constructive criticism," says Solomon-Baum, who is now consulting and leading marketing for a new ballet company in Los Angeles. "It became a praise festival...."
The divide on the issue is partially generational, several HR specialists say... Many younger employees entered the workforce while managers had loosened expectations on productivity and performance, and may have had less stringent grading in college amid remote classes, making the postpandemic adjustment more difficult. "It's the first time that they have not just gotten professional feedback, but it might be the first time in quite a while that somebody said, 'You know, this isn't good enough,'" says Megan Gerhardt, a management professor at Miami University and the author of a book on leading intergenerational workforces.
"I refuse to believe this is true," writes Apple blogger John Gruber, "and if it is true, my feedback is that any company that encounters an employee who bristles at the word feedback should fire them on the spot."
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status='Feedback'+Is+Now+Too+Harsh.+The+New+Word+is+'Feedforward'%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fit.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F1929234%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fit.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F1929234%2Ffeedback-is-now-too-harsh-the-new-word-is-feedforward%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://it.slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/1929234/feedback-is-now-too-harsh-the-new-word-is-feedforward?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://it.slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/1929234/feedback-is-now-too-harsh-the-new-word-is-feedforward?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**How Exxon Tried to Undermine Climate Change Science**
An anonymous reader shared this report from the Guardian:
ExxonMobil executives privately sought to undermine climate science even after the oil and gas giant publicly acknowledged the link between fossil fuel emissions and climate change, according to previously unreported documents revealed by the Wall Street Journal.
The new revelations are based on previously unreported documents subpoenaed by New York's attorney general as part of an investigation into the company announced in 2015. They add to a slew of documents that record a decades-long misinformation campaign waged by Exxon, which are cited in a growing number of state and municipal lawsuits against big oil... In 2008, Exxon pledged to stop funding climate-denier groups. But that very same year, company leadership said it would support the company in directing a scientist to help the nation's top oil and gas lobbying group write a paper about the "uncertainty" of measuring greenhouse gas emissions...
The documents could bolster legal efforts to hold oil companies accountable for their alleged attempts to sow doubt about climate science. More than two dozen U.S. cities and states are suing big oil, claiming the industry knew for decades about the dangers of burning coal, oil and gas but hid that information.
More context from NPR:
Earlier investigations found Exxon worked for decades to sow confusion about climate change, even though its own scientists had begun warning executives as early as 1977 that carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels were warming the planet, posing dire risks to human beings. By the late 1980s, concern was growing domestically and overseas that fossil fuel use was heating the planet, increasing the risks of extreme weather. In response, the Journal reported, Exxon executive Frank Sprow sent a memo to colleagues warning that if there were a global consensus on addressing climate change, "substantial negative impacts on Exxon could occur." According to the Journal, Sprow wrote: "Any additional R&D efforts within Corporate Research on Greenhouse should have two primary purposes: 1. Protect the value of our resources (oil, gas, coal). 2. Preserve Exxon's business options."
Sprow told the Journal that the approach in his memo was adopted as policy, in "what would become a central pillar of Exxon's strategy," the paper said. A few years after the memo, Exxon became the architect of a highly effective strategy of climate change denial that succeeded for decades in politicizing climate policy and delaying meaningful action to cut heat-trapping pollution...
Last year, Exxon said it plans to spend about $17 billion on "lower emission initiatives" through 2027. That represents, at most, 17% of the total capital investments the company plans to make during that period. Exxon recently said it is buying a company called Denbury that specializes in capturing carbon dioxide emissions and injecting them into oil wells to boost production. It's also planning to build a hydrogen plant and a facility to capture and store carbon emissions in Texas.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=How+Exxon+Tried+to+Undermine+Climate+Change+Science%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F0519248%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F0519248%2Fhow-exxon-tried-to-undermine-climate-change-science%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/0519248/how-exxon-tried-to-undermine-climate-change-science?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/0519248/how-exxon-tried-to-undermine-climate-change-science?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**KSMBD Finally Reaches 'Stable' State in Release Candidate for Linux Kernel 6.6**
When Linus Torvalds announced Linux kernel 6.6's first release candidate, it included a newly-stable version of KSMBD, which is Samsung's in-kernel server for the SMB protocol (for sharing files/folders/printers over a network).
An announcement in 2021 had said that "For many cases the current userspace server choices were suboptimal either due to memory footprint, performance or difficulty integrating well with advanced Linux features."
LWN noted at the time that Linux has been using "the user-space Samba solution since shortly after the beginning."
In a sense, ksmbd is not meant to compete with Samba; indeed, it has been developed in cooperation with the Samba project. It is, however, meant to be a more performant and focused solution than Samba is; at this point, Samba includes a great deal of functionality beyond simple file serving. Ksmbd claims significant performance improvements on a wide range of benchmarks...One other reason — which tends to be spoken rather more quietly — is that a new implementation can be licensed under GPLv2, while Samba is GPLv3.
The Register notes that when Samba switched to GPL 3, "one result was that Apple dropped Samba from Mac OS X and replaced it with its own, in-house server called SMBX." And they also remember that a month after its debut in 2021, "Linux sysadmins got to enjoy KSMBD's first security exploit."
What's changed now is that it has faced considerable security testing and as a result it is no longer marked as experimental. It's been developed with the assistance of the Samba team, which itself documents how to use it. It's compatible with existing Samba configuration files. As the team says, "It is not meant to replace the existing Samba fileserver 'smbd', but rather be an extension and will integrate with Samba in the future...."
KSMBD is also important in that placing such core server functionality right inside the kernel represents a significant potential attack surface for crackers... The new bcachefs file system will not be going into kernel 6.6, and its developer is not happy.
"It's taken some time to get KSMBD to a state that was considered stable," points out Linux magazine. That time has come, and KSMBD is planned for Linux kernel 6.6.:
But why is KSMBD important? First off, it promises considerable performance gains and better support for modern features such as Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)... KSMBD also adds enhanced security, considerably better performance for both single and multi-thread read/write, better stability, and higher compatibility. In the end, hopefully, this KSMBD will also mean easier share setups in Linux without having to jump through the same hoops one must with the traditional Samba setup.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=KSMBD+Finally+Reaches+'Stable'+State+in+Release+Candidate+for+Linux+Kernel+6.6%3A+https%3A%2F%2Flinux.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F0412208%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Flinux.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F16%2F0412208%2Fksmbd-finally-reaches-stable-state-in-release-candidate-for-linux-kernel-66%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://linux.slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/0412208/ksmbd-finally-reaches-stable-state-in-release-candidate-for-linux-kernel-66?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/23/09/16/0412208/ksmbd-finally-reaches-stable-state-in-release-candidate-for-linux-kernel-66?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**Conditions On Earth May Be Moving Outside the 'Safe Operating Space' For Humanity**
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: Human actions have pushed the world into the danger zone on several key indicators of planetary health, threatening to trigger dramatic changes in conditions on Earth, according to a new analysis from 29 scientists in eight countries. The scientists analyzed nine interlinked "planetary boundaries," which they define as thresholds the world needs to stay within to ensure a stable, livable planet. These include climate change, biodiversity, freshwater and land use, and the impact of synthetic chemicals and aerosols. Human activities have breached safe levels for six of these boundaries and are pushing the world outside a "safe operating space" for humanity, according to the report, published on Wednesday in the journal Science Advances.
The nine boundaries, first set out in a 2009 paper, aim to establish a set of defined "limits" on changes humans are making to the planet -- from pumping out planet-heating pollution to clearing forests for farming. Beyond these limits, the theory goes, the risk of destabilizing conditions on Earth increases dramatically. The limits are designed to be conservative, to enable society to solve the problems before reaching a "very high risk zone," said Katherine Richardson, a professor in biological oceanography at the University of Copenhagen and a co-author on the report. She pointed to the unprecedented summer of extreme weather the world has just experienced at 1.2 degrees Celsius of global warming. "We didn't think it was going to be like this at 1 degree \[Celsius\]" she said. "No human has experienced the conditions that we're experiencing right now," she added.
Of the three boundaries that scientists found are still within a safe space, two of them -- ocean acidification and the amount of aerosols in the atmosphere -- are moving in the wrong direction. There is some good news, however. The ozone layer was on the wrong side of the boundary in the 1990s, Richardson said. But thanks to international cooperation to phase out ozone-depleting chemicals, it is on track to recover completely. Crossing planetary boundaries does not mean the world has reached a disastrous tipping point. Hitting one does not mean "falling off a cliff," Richardson said. But it is a clear warning signal. The significance of the planetary boundaries model is that it doesn't analyze climate and biodiversity in isolation, the report authors said. Instead, it looks at the interaction of both, as well as a host of other ways humans are affecting the planet. Breaching one boundary is likely to have knock-on effects for others.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Conditions+On+Earth+May+Be+Moving+Outside+the+'Safe+Operating+Space'+For+Humanity%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F14%2F0040249%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F14%2F0040249%2Fconditions-on-earth-may-be-moving-outside-the-safe-operating-space-for-humanity%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/09/14/0040249/conditions-on-earth-may-be-moving-outside-the-safe-operating-space-for-humanity?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/09/14/0040249/conditions-on-earth-may-be-moving-outside-the-safe-operating-space-for-humanity?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**IEEE Specctrum Announces Top Programming Languages of 2023: Python and SQL**
Last week IEEE Spectrum released its 10th annual rankings of the Top Programming Languages.
It choose a top language for each of three categories: actively used among typical IEEE members and working software engineers, in demand by employers, or "in the zeitgeist".
The results?
This year, Python doesn't just remain No. 1 in our general "Spectrum" ranking — which is weighted to reflect the interests of the typical IEEE member — but it widens its lead.
Python's increased dominance appears to be largely at the expense of smaller, more specialized, languages. It has become the jack-of-all-trades language — and the master of some, such as AI, where powerful and extensive libraries make it ubiquitous. And although Moore's Law is winding down for high-end computing, low-end microcontrollers are still benefiting from performance gains, which means there's now enough computing power available on a US $0.70 CPU to make Python a contender in embedded development, despite the overhead of an interpreter. Python also looks to be solidifying its position for the long term: Many children and teens now program their first game or blink their first LED using Python. They can then move seamlessly into more advanced domains, and even get a job, with the same language.
But Python alone does not make a career. In our "Jobs" ranking, it is SQL that shines at No. 1. Ironically though, you're very unlikely to get a job as a pure SQL programmer. Instead, employers love, love, love, seeing SQL skills in tandem with some other language such as Java or C++. With today's distributed architectures, a lot of business-critical data live in SQL databases...
But don't let Python and SQL's rankings fool you: Programming is still far from becoming a monoculture. Java and the various C-like languages outweigh Python in their combined popularity, especially for high-performance or resource-sensitive tasks where that interpreter overhead of Python's is still too costly (although there are a number of attempts to make Python more competitive on that front). And there are software ecologies that are resistant to being absorbed into Python for other reasons.
The article cites the statistical analysis/visualization language R, as well as Fortran and Cobol, as languages that are hard to port code from or that have accumulated large already-validated codebases. But Python also remains at #1 in their third "Trending" category — with Java in second there and on the general "IEEE Spectrum" list.
JavaScript appears below Python and Java on all three lists. Java is immediately below them on the Trending and "Jobs" list, but two positions further down on the general "Spectrum" list (below C++ and C).
The metrics used for the calculation include the number of hits on Google, recent questions on Stack Overflow, tags on Discord, mentions in IEEE's library of journal articles and its CareerBuilder job site, and language use in starred GitHub repositories and number of new programming books.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=IEEE+Specctrum+Announces+Top+Programming+Languages+of+2023%3A+Python+and+SQL%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F11%2F023222%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F11%2F023222%2Fieee-specctrum-announces-top-programming-languages-of-2023-python-and-sql%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://developers.slashdot.org/story/23/09/11/023222/ieee-specctrum-announces-top-programming-languages-of-2023-python-and-sql?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://developers.slashdot.org/story/23/09/11/023222/ieee-specctrum-announces-top-programming-languages-of-2023-python-and-sql?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**Is Gen Z Giving Up on College?**
Business Insider reports on "a soaring number of Gen Zers who has decided to skip college altogether.
"Four million fewer teenagers enrolled at a college in 2022 than in 2012."
For many, the price tag has simply grown too exorbitant to justify the cost. From 2010 to 2022, college tuition rose an average of 12% a year, while overall inflation only increased an average of 2.6% each year. Today it costs at least $104,108 on average to attend four years of public university — and $223,360 for a private university.
At the same time, the salaries students can expect to earn after graduation haven't kept up with the cost of college. A 2019 report from the Pew Research Center found that earnings for young college-educated workers had remained mostly flat over the past 50 years. Four years after graduating, according to recent data from the Higher Education Authority, a third of students earn less than $40,000 — lower than the average salary of $44,356 that workers with only a high-school diploma earn. Factor in the average student debt of $33,500 that college graduates owe after they leave school, and many graduates will spend years catching up with their degree-less counterparts. This student-debt-driven financial hole is leaving more young graduates with a lower net worth than previous generations.
The widening gap between the value and the cost of college has started to shift Gen Z's attitude toward higher education. A 2022 survey by Morning Consult found that 41% of Gen Zers said they "tend to trust US colleges and universities," the lowest percentage of any generation. It's a significant shift from when millennials were in their shoes a decade ago: A 2014 Pew Research survey found that 63% of millennials valued a college education or planned to get one. And of those who graduated, 41% of that cohort considered their schooling "very useful" in readying them to enter the workforce — that's compared to 45% of Gen Xers and 47% of boomers who felt the same...
The focus now, especially in the midst of so much uncertainty in the economy, is on using college to prepare for a single, overriding goal: getting a good job.
The article argues this is transforming which classes get emphasized by both students and colleges. For example, in 2014 computer programming was only the 7th most popular major at U.C. Berkeley — but now it's #1. And the data science degree Berkeley created five years ago is now already its third most popular.
And meanwhile, "last year only 7% of Harvard freshmen planned to major in the humanities — down from 20% a decade earlier and almost 30% in the 1970s."
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader yusing for sharing the article.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Is+Gen+Z+Giving+Up+on+College%3F%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F10%2F2234213%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F10%2F2234213%2Fis-gen-z-giving-up-on-college%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/09/10/2234213/is-gen-z-giving-up-on-college?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/09/10/2234213/is-gen-z-giving-up-on-college?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**Small Protest Against Cruise Robotaxis Cites Concerns for Safety - and Displaced Workers**
Last Monday the U.S. celebrated Labor Day, the federal holiday honoring America's labor movement and the contributions of U.S. workers. On that day a small protest was held outside Cruise's headquarters in San Francisco — featuring taxi drivers and mass transit workers.
CBS News spoke to Edward Escobar, a Bay Area Uber driver and director of the Alliance for Independent Workers. They report that Escobar orchestrated the protest "to convey their concerns about the potential impact of robotaxis on their jobs.
"There isn't any dialogue happening. It's pretty much one-sided. It's being dictated by the tech titans, Waymo, which is Google, and General Motors, which is Cruise," Escobar said. "And they're pretty much dictating the terms, and the California Public Utilities Commission is allowing that to happen."
Cruise, however, insists that it is taking steps to protect workers through partnerships with local labor unions. In a statement, the company said, "Cruise was proud to sign industry-first jobs agreements with local labor — IBEW Local 6 and SEIU Local 87 — whose workers will install chargers and support our facilities across San Francisco." Cruise also highlighted its commitment to the community by emphasizing that the construction of a major EV charging facility on Cesar Chavez Street was carried out by 100% Bay Area union labor. It included electricians, carpenters, and ironworkers, representing over 100 jobs.
Despite these efforts, Escobar remains deeply concerned about the future of drivers like himself. "We're looking at automation, self-driving technology in the new age of AI and looking at permanent displacement of many workers. If you look at transport workers alone in the state of California, UC Berkeley came out with a study, and they said approximately 600,000-plus transport workers in California will be displaced."
One local newscast shows only a handful of activists in its video from the protest. The local news anchor summarized the protesters' message as "The robots are taking over and taking your jobs.... \[And\] making things more dangerous..."
"The people of San Francisco, the workers of San Francisco have to take a stand now," said Steve Zeltzer with United Front Committee for Labor Party... The group who rallied Monday also said Cruise's driverless taxis not only violate vehicle codes, but also are not advanced enough to know when to pull over for responding emergency vehicles. Every time they are on the road, they violate the law," Zeltzer said. The speakers at the Labor Day protest said so-called "robo workers" and artificial intelligence are chipping away at jobs. And before we know it, demonstrators claim, a flood of high-tech human replacements will steal the jobs of the masses.
"We're talking about millions, if not billions, of people being displaced," said Edward Escobar with Alliance for Independent Workers. "Not just here locally, but nationally and globally."
The Verge adds:
GM's Cruise is "just days away" from regulatory approval to begin mass production of its fully autonomous vehicle without a steering wheel or pedals, the company's CEO, Kyle Vogt, said at an investor conference Thursday...
But Vogt may have spoken too soon. "No agency decision to grant or deny the petition submitted by GM has been reached nor has a deadline been set for such a decision," a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration spokesperson told The Verge.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Small+Protest+Against+Cruise+Robotaxis+Cites+Concerns+for+Safety+-+and+Displaced+Workers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F10%2F1027222%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F10%2F1027222%2Fsmall-protest-against-cruise-robotaxis-cites-concerns-for-safety---and-displaced-workers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/09/10/1027222/small-protest-against-cruise-robotaxis-cites-concerns-for-safety---and-displaced-workers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/09/10/1027222/small-protest-against-cruise-robotaxis-cites-concerns-for-safety---and-displaced-workers?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
**It's the 50th Anniversary of 'Star Trek: the Animated Series'**
Star Trek: The Animated Series was a half-hour Saturday morning cartoon that premiered exactly one half century ago — yesterday. You can watch its opening credits sequence on YouTube — with its strange 1970s version of the theme song. CBS's YouTube channel also offers clips from various episodes.
Starting in 1973, it ran for two seasons — a total of just 22 episodes. But the BBC notes it kept Star Trek in people's minds after the original series had been cancelled in 1969:
While The Original Series had struggled in the ratings during its initial run, the show thrived in syndication, and created the phenomenon of fan conventions (think Comic-con in the present day). Because of this, studios were interested in more Star Trek, but there was a problem: the sets had been scrapped, the costumes were gone, and it would have been cost-prohibitive to rebuild everything from scratch. NBC settled on a different approach: an animated series.
According to The Fifty-Year Mission by Mark Altman and Edward Gross (an oral history of Star Trek), Gene Roddenberry wasn't overly interested in an animated show in and of itself. However, he was willing to go along with it because he saw it as a stepping stone to another live-action show or a feature film. An animated show would energise fans, he thought, so he agreed on the condition that he would have full creative control of The Animated Series. After a fight, the network gave in. The full, regular cast returned, with the exception of Walter Koenig's Pavel Chekov, who was cut for budget reasons...
\[I\]t was very much conceived of as a continuation of The Original Series. Some of the episodes were direct sequels, such as More Tribbles, More Trouble, which is a continuation of the classic The Trouble with Tribbles, and featured the return of Cyrano Jones... \[Another episode was a sequel to The City on the Edge of Forever.\] Dorothy (DC) Fontana led a group of writers from the original show who mostly wrote for a traditional, adult Star Trek audience. That's why the show didn't catch on — while it was well-received by critics, it might have done better in prime time. The show won a Daytime Emmy for best children's series, but it was cancelled after two years because of low ratings. Roddenberry then moved on to work on another live-action series, called Phase II, which would eventually become Star Trek: The Motion Picture...
Whatever is decided regarding "the canon", The Animated Series sits firmly within Star Trek's guiding ethos: Gene Roddenberry's vision for a utopian future where humans coexist peacefully with aliens as part of a Federation, and there's no poverty or war.
https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=It's+the+50th+Anniversary+of+'Star+Trek%3A+the+Animated+Series'%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F10%2F045254%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter)https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png (http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F23%2F09%2F10%2F045254%2Fits-the-50th-anniversary-of-star-trek-the-animated-series%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook)
Read more of this story (https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/23/09/10/045254/its-the-50th-anniversary-of-star-trek-the-animated-series?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&utm_medium=feed) at Slashdot.
https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/23/09/10/045254/its-the-50th-anniversary-of-star-trek-the-animated-series?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by Slashdot (RSS Feed) | export