Creation is quantum, decision classical.


Nature and reality are equivocal—everything speaks of everything, everything is a symbol. «Equivocation» is not error, it is the rightness by which we err, and it demands subtlety. «This is the best of all possible worlds»—we do not err much if we do not exaggerate, even if we are guided by hearsay and superstition.


Hollywood Nights - Bob Seger & The Silver Bullet Band


Seen as «sino», for example as man and woman,—their child, the result, the work of art, «are the good middle»—spontaneous and around which the quarrels occur. The same is true between Palestine and Israel, between Russia and the United States, and between East and West: the results of these relations are not only children of the earth, but are also «something truer» than the opinions of the parties.


Intuition «turns out» to be practice. (x^{|x|})


In practice, the material can only be partial; thus, in daily life, private property and money as fungible values hold great significance. In what is dead, only the shell remains: the implicit has been stripped of its soul, gold, momentum, and faith. That body no longer inhumates; it is mere exhibition and confession, and so it continues to decompose. Decomposition is the body's return to the world, a going back to the world, which is why people may find joy in the misfortune of others. The inhumation of the dead body remains in the hands of the living.


As astronomy is the sacrifice of astrology, so truth is the sacrifice of art. What is sacrificed of the original dream one may be willing to lose. https://image.nostr.build/516f0fb10c02e51df5ddf75eba8c84bca8336cb31ff8bad46f45fa1e72384b3d.jpg


Mathematicians are the archaeologists of apparitions, and archaeologists are the mathematicians of history.


History is a more transient origin, it is the conscience of the origin, a parabolic anticipation and advance of the origin, an originality. https://image.nostr.build/534813de4d974ef139c5fcef35f527849ee4c417765400cc45d046c65515a5cb.jpg


A human tragedy that is repeated in large and small, is how people who are not complete but more comprehensive, cut off an Einstein's head because they can. Something may be of greater radius and more superficial: the imposition of force does not guarantee completeness.


Capacity is more insidious than existence.


Those who despise themselves too much are not identifying with their existence but with their capacity. https://image.nostr.build/93059b73077bf834518ab6c14fa3aa70a7592a2860c3902770c4841ebb95ee9b.jpg


Results find themselves between possibilities and probability. https://image.nostr.build/c6ff0430992124e480def9477f98c69dc29298392c058633bce52ee0a815acaa.jpg https://image.nostr.build/df116dcc9b3b8c7440889c1b3ce2466a7dc28cfabc63aaf820dd722463bed7c8.jpg


Causation is the effect of conception.


¿Para qué el rodeo? Los problemas son solucionables de una, pero sin experiencia. «Este es el mejor de los mundos posibles»: incluso los problemas nos sirven como medio para la experiencia.


Appreciation and contempt are infinite, guaranteeing the independence of human nature; the limits are ours alone.


Contempt exercises you against destruction, flattery against aggrandizement, and congeniality is the exercise of equality.


Our genius is the «Intention» of something great. It is convenient for us to distinguish our innate logic as the tree is distinguished from the fruit.


Innate logic is made up of simple power and a simple form, intertwined. It is like capital: fungible.


AI today is a bad artist, but a good illustrator. Illustration is what cannot be missing in a painting, but there is something missing in a painting that is just illustration. AI, as happened before with photography, will motivate illustrators to be better artists. https://image.nostr.build/0b940eae9ca2a3d7736f41f406f4d35c8f8974cdb177631ea814d11f85ba98a2.jpg


Waiting is the effort of the unconscious, measured both in hours or absence. Restlessness comes with a conscious perspective of the unconscious. https://image.nostr.build/246ecd9f3005d9824de6d3b08467043381dc1ac2942b98877a11c7f0a1621fe1.jpg


The moderate is more simultaneous. https://image.nostr.build/29752c5f413b28cdd991422f441a8eb3e7dfb846dd8b84215f87d0536aa5261f.jpg


The conscious is the slave of the unconscious. That the unconscious is immoral is a prejudice of consciousness: unconsciousness is also a parable, but it has a greater and more comprehensive economy. https://image.nostr.build/cb8c6e2bfcc0451a70c67094a431417166cf96735ecd2008c552bd04c71e56c4.jpg


The romantic sees the decline of heroes and gods as a loss, not realizing that the increased transparency in the «heroic and Dionysian» makes the best possible.


The tantalizing hunger for precision, and its satisfaction, result from the lack of a genius that rests in itself. https://image.nostr.build/0da2f33af7aabff5fb0743a67eaf5c856b7c65749b1d0026a6544bcfdcb09c64.jpg


Potential is preeminent, it preserves us, it anticipates, and ultimately it is the «all-healing victory». Why then should we compare it or, worse, sacrifice it for certainty, is it not foolish to think that committing is superior to potential? https://image.nostr.build/c566c5a5f8c323f912ae715bae4d097617e17da90222dd675fc0bdb861141288.jpg


Potential is preeminent over committing. https://image.nostr.build/0e306546da91a13af87748b233f2346fc24f9853d4c926d040c74392010415a4.jpg


Prime numbers are the conjunction of the shield and the sword (of 0 and 1), the map that locates them, the map that locates the X, the map that leads to the treasure.

Los números primos son la conjunción del escudo y la espada (de 0 y 1), el mapa que los localiza, el mapa que localiza la cruz, el mapa que te lleva al tesoro. https://image.nostr.build/018d63c49176df7b947dc39d142b8a860701576b6bfa22ba965708893bc7a288.jpg


Error de pensamiento: separar lo preeminente de la completud. Lo total y preeminente no es dogmático. Querer que todos los elementos sean como el conjunto, o que un elemento se crea el conjunto, eso es lo dogmático. https://image.nostr.build/ce72e13b2224d9f68d4790189eeb61eebd45fd940abb77b73ccfbc74133c16ba.jpg


An objectivity formed from all perspectives is not the same as an objectivity formed from none,--in this latter case, what objectivity produces is thorough envy. On the other hand, an objectivity formed from a sufficient number of perspectives produces the ability to overcome without playing the same game.


Lo común a todos, que es lo más comprensivo, actúa en lo menos comprensivo, como compartido, copiado y dividido.

The common to all, which is the most comprehensive, acts in the less comprehensive as copied, shared and divided. https://image.nostr.build/ddc1e21b12988b21f6d099db6e6c5faae6b3cb57b57e1b083682e6e72a37d948.jpg


El antagonismo comienza con las diferencias de potencial. En la paz tampoco hay consenso.


What produces boredom is not complexity, but the lack of complexity in a perspective. Negativity always comes from the less complex and comprehensive perspective, even when it is the growth of what is observed that makes us react this way. https://image.nostr.build/36d5cb05d93f14987e2751c3ac24eae07d787d8d7a4978dc2a683870e5bdfe88.jpg


It is the radius of comprehension that «informs» anything. https://image.nostr.build/a555ba22d42d34a5b68d2551bc9ade18f59ad7cc5d8823b423874583884ab9e1.jpg


Mathematics is a parable of the long history of a small field. https://image.nostr.build/ded682bdb24611f1f9c805f910f165184b178d377af77e5ba7751a44d11c9434.jpg


Sin resignación pensamos que la tierra no es una esfera. https://image.nostr.build/2dec3a2c0829a54895ca0033b36bdec5a56b1eab677390e676df961945f88e29.jpg


"The ultimate goal would be: to grasp that everything in the realm of fact is already theory. The blue of the sky shows us the basic law of chromatics. Let us not seek for something behind the phenomena—they themselves are the theory."—Goethe

La teoría trata directamente con algo distante. El materialismo mediocre es muy inferior al camino hacia la supersimetría que impele al superhombre. Lo material es valioso si también es teórico: un punto de apoyo y estructura de emplazamiento inspirada hacia una supersimetría. https://image.nostr.build/17a2db02ad7b5c4aa8a950f6f9ef3d50538cd7b7557ec33423008a856e94d59d.jpg


La hazaña no compensa la necesidad de falta. https://image.nostr.build/0a4a909eecea22775a9f58d8ea0bd33dbd13e6005c15b9cf25bc88495f8f5389.jpg


The negative affirms the central eccentrically. https://image.nostr.build/468f8fab49fa83dbe98682d4e3181ac626b618959568a5e75c1418926b568b21.jpg


To improve is to conserve in advance. https://image.nostr.build/ac39384fc98a65f0aa3db167ca1b1d860dc6ff3b1f6f265cdca3a8c8ac93cc4e.jpg


La decadencia terminal es como se alimenta la potencia simple original. El fruto es una decadencia terminal. https://image.nostr.build/cbbed2b0e02e664e02fe2c0f75da8c9489a50f8e60571c4cb5f2f0df211594cb.jpg


He who has inhibited the path to independence, by means of and fear of the increase of equality and freedom of the elements that constitute him, will seek it with violence towards the whole. This is the problem of the fear of death, shame and decadence: where it is appropriate to accept them, they are a path that leads to the simple and constituent power of all that is central.


Al no darle curso al poder, inhibiendo la superación, la distinción, la independencia y el dejar atrás, crecerá la violencia.


Lo nervioso lo crea una imposición del potencial sobre el deber. https://image.nostr.build/aec5499dc7ef1b0ce49c574124457a1fe8c3edece60ad47ef870f241937f13e1.jpg


Los límites son la moderación en una esfera reducida, «cosmópolis en la tierra», y lo que experimentamos como hermosura. https://image.nostr.build/540c96a7ee7b5b4c7b5db7a2a6d1e9e0e61df698ac3954020a882677efd40d57.jpg


«La violencia es un poder atado», quien nos enfurece nos está aportando algo sagrado—su insistencia de mármol es un mejor fundamento para conquistarla. https://image.nostr.build/cc685492d9903cb817aa1c9bb683cf0205ca03de9a3bbc57c2a3587e71d7d178.jpg https://image.nostr.build/5138a2d4eddf314744241857357b0af81501c9b7626f5b8ec526c4a9a57e38e8.jpg


Potencial y acción son lo mismo en distintas circunstancias, la acción es un potencial que se encuentra en una esfera menos comprensiva, donde hay menos tiempo y lugar para las articulaciones, y las cosas se deben mover mucho más rápido.


Dogmatists have no sense of humor. https://image.nostr.build/af5b92b2eaa923871b0881ae4eee5bcd40740c02361cab002fd5681195b956f1.jpg


El intelecto como mediador entre la potencia simple y su figuración, entre lo simétrico y su figuración, entre lo semejante y su figuración. https://image.nostr.build/6c2fe30f61229ed29a7b4c8e95cb2fe10d34d35e5ca3cd8798c3d0ea8704eb7c.jpg


La equivocación es una simetría no reconocida.


Intuir es reconocer una figura que opaca lo menos posible la potencia original.

Intuition is to recognize a shape that obscures as little as possible the original potency.


El mismo efecto estético que producen los astros alrededor del sol, es el que producen los instintos alrededor del alma (su giro alrededor del alma, son el deseo en la falta y su extinción en la satisfacción)—desde nuestra perspectiva le dan color e interés al rodeo.

Igual uno quiere cuidarse de no sobrevalorar el sol como parece haber hecho Akenatón: el ateísmo no parece reconocer «la inmensa cantidad de posibilidades que hay presentes en la potencia simple».

Del otro lado están los supersticiosos: confunden la parábola del origen con el origen, confunden el potencial (que de no ser poético nos destruiría), con la validez objetiva.


Sobre la comprensión del ocio:

Cuando la muerte está cerca, intentamos evitarla y soportarla (práctica, ejercicio), y como en cualquier juego, vamos haciéndolo cada vez mejor acorde a nuestra capacidad; «lo que no te mata te hace más fuerte»—Nietzsche.

Pero cuando estamos lejos de la muerte la tratamos de otra manera, el valor de evitarla disminuye y lo que hacemos es exponernos a ella, vivirla, cosa que sí haces cuando la muerte está cerca es como rendirte a ella, una dejadez o cobardía.

Este es el problema de Moisés contra Amalec (Af. 100-102, La Tijera): levantar los brazos requiere evitar, cosa en la cual, quien está habituado a aceptar todo como si este fuera «el mejor de los mundos posibles» y entregarse a la muerte, no tiene mucha habilidad (habilidad de evitar).

Nada ha separado más a la humanidad que esto, ya que el hombre práctico, preocupado por sobrevivir, muchas veces estima poco valioso a un Moisés, mientras que la verdad es que mucho de lo valioso en la religión, el arte, la filosofía y la ciencia, nos viene de este robo que un Prometeo o Moisés le hacen a los dioses.

¿Cómo lograron esto?: el hombre no es un dios ni un semidiós, es mortal. Pero cuando la seguridad de sus circunstancias le permite ocio, es decir, cuando se le permite tratar con la muerte a distancia sin tener que evitarla, como hacen Moisés y Prometeo, entonces ahí puede experimentar un poco de “la muerte en vida”, de lo que podríamos experimentar si fuéramos más comprensivos y no muriéramos donde morimos.

Donde el hombre muere, no sigue vivo, pero ahí no moriría el semidiós—para él sí hay una parábola luego de la muerte donde no la hay para el mortal: para un dios lo que para nosotros no ocurre luego de morir, es tan solo un irse a «dormir y soñar».

Entonces cuando el hombre puede tratar la muerte a distancia, tiene una pizca de lo que es ser más comprensivo, superior, al menos algo de los sueños de lo más comprensivo, y le roba así estos conocimientos embriagados de utopías a los dioses (de ahí que de no comprender lo que está haciendo puede experimentar resaca, ser encerrado por su insolencia en el Cáucaso).

De esto es de lo que depende la nobleza del «Übermensch», de lo que depende el desarrollo de la humanidad. https://image.nostr.build/380d3fea4a366355cf54c92856b9987d9b0219491577b5a459425e8d49e346a6.jpg https://image.nostr.build/dec3a485bb283675f8e00d6daf35273884735cce501fe5e5ee5e715f494126f6.jpg


Si tu éxito te pudiera definir, valdrías poco. https://image.nostr.build/abe2703a61cdc84489b8b7cace41df5bd052e0f2809e14493b753c658b7fce35.jpg


Imagination, illusion and suffering, transcend the atheistic and primitive materialism that has always ruled the majority.


El valor del esfuerzo es análogo a lo que la geometría y la simetría le aportan a las cosas. Platón se había dado cuenta que la geometría, por ejemplo el hexágono, le aporta fuerza al hombre, como lo hace el esfuerzo, y que hay una relación entre estos “dos mundos”.

Hay que relacionar a la Goethe «lo más inmediato solo con lo más inmediato», pero a la vez, es verdad que lo intemporal es preeminente sobre lo temporal. Hay cosas a las que el tiempo no puede hincarle el diente, y son tan reales como lo efímero y circunstancial.


Lo mental es: la fisiología en los sentidos, la fisiología reflejada en los sentidos, nuestra lógica innata reflejada en los sentidos, nuestra máxima capacidad reflejada en los sentidos.


Quizás el hecho de que los efectos del orden de nuestra lógica innata suban desde las partículas más finas, lo atestigua el que experimentamos el tiempo transcurriendo mucho más lento en el esfuerzo que en lo dionisiaco, siendo entonces esto, testimonio de que ese orden original, «porque es muy grande el acercamiento o muy chico el alejamiento»–Jünger, es mucho más veloz en términos prácticos, que aquello más derivado y que hacemos con esfuerzo. De ahí nuestra preferencia por el «amor fati» por sobre «la sujeción a la disciplina». Pero relacionado con esto también vemos el valor de la tragedia: ¿no hay duración sin esfuerzo?


The value of experimentation is also to be seen as the path to the specific and subtle genius of the «yes» part of fate—(sino).


Lo popular, el manadismo, «buscar lo particular en lo general», es un criterio de selección cuanto peor estamos.


All roads lead to Rome, as long as the vision is the same.


Solo un hombre engañado puede morir.


Quizás el valor del conocimiento no es para distinguir, sino para no distinguir. Para dejar de darle a esto o aquello un énfasis exagerado. Dándole a cada cosa el lugar que le corresponde, incluyendo el que le corresponde a nuestras limitaciones, recuperamos o no perdemos la ponderación equivalente de transparencia que se preserva en la realidad no importa en cuántas partes se la divida.


The maximum value of the consensus is limited and contained in the caste.

This is what modern culture is experimenting with and redefining the bases: it wants to answer this question: what is the limit of consensus?

Hence the double light with which the new generations illuminate these groups, both positively and negatively.

The increase in drug use is also related to this: what is established is a set of emerging orders, of new groups that make up society, and these, in the transitional stage (titanism), that is, while they are executed in haste, do not yet result as capital giving interests, but for now, they remain Dionysian and surreal.


Lo surreal en la práctica es un interés compuesto ejecutado a las apuradas.


The geometric point is a natural son of Euclid, but an adopted son for most mathematicians or scientists.


Lo negativo es errarle al sentido en el infinito.


Free will is the illusion of control that results from following or not following what we do not control.


La imagen, necesaria para la duración de algo en la tierra, la provee más la semilla que el órgano, de ahí que Nietzsche haya hablado bien del «vivir peligrosamente». No es tanto que el órgano no esté en peligro, es que la semilla «se encuentra a sí misma en círculos más amplios». https://image.nostr.build/33d2a57ca50d079eced94274db6eeeb16bba8047559a0195bfefec456ef25b05.jpg


Great solutions are achieved in an unconscious experimentation with the problem, trying hypothetical rungs and scaffolds as a means to an end, until suddenly a complete solution appears, motivating us to act.


Hay cosas que hacés sin esfuerzo, y con esfuerzo sería para vos imposible hacerlas. De esta experiencia vienen dichos como «en el interior todo está hecho». Hacés el amor y un hijo, pero te sería imposible concebirlo de manera matemática-esotérica; no podemos unir esos puntos con la conciencia, es un talento innato. Lo mismo ocurre con el entendimiento; buenos pensadores reconocen cuánto de su inteligencia es original e inconsciente. Sugiero que lo mismo describen los físicos al contrastar mecánica cuántica (innato) y clásica (conciencia).


With technology we have been replacing the slavery of people with the slavery of death. Humanism.


La exhibición se paga con la heroicidad: como lo hizo Heracles, como lo hacen el sepulturero o el desollador, o con la marginalización.


The phenomenon that physicists call "quantum decoherence" is the same phenomenon that Nietzsche describes as the error of "leaving an action lying in the gutter afterwards" and "as the inability not to react". One has to believe oneself to be a child of God to claim that one is not quantum.


Gravity results from the formula by extraction of the clarity in mystery.


Dogmatism is how the psychic affects the physical, it makes one affect oneself. In its sick aspect it is a Stockholm Syndrome, and how the psychic harms the physical. There is nothing against the psychosomatic, the mental power of humanity is genial, what is fucked up is the constraint being taught (and then self-inflicted) by the worst of others.


As we have limits, the relative is absolute. https://image.nostr.build/e8ea400fedf367ccdd747b8d7c87cb819675417dde00257ba7df17356c96b221.jpg


The difference between science and superstition is that the former does not skip any steps. This is not something minor, since it is what also differentiates reality from dreams. Dreams are more chaotic, they are more parabolic, their story takes more jumps than those of reality, and learning the steps in between those jumps is what transforms them into reality.


History travels the world at a different speed than potential. https://image.nostr.build/182c6bd99c51e12f281df60dd46af5c33bdd593689a29b7f123b54573faa5a0f.jpg


In the full presence of history there are still shortcomings, as with the full presence of sight there are still missing senses https://image.nostr.build/6785b081a004c79193becf0870791b2422dbd9d94eac459e7906b4d57f6869b2.jpg


Knowing is «an attempt», a type of creating that gives itself airs of being god, and in this attempt has conquered many things of late for the humankind.


"Know yourself."

When a pleasant suspicion is confirmed, does decoherence occur to a lesser extent?

The distinction between the coherence of a suspicion and decoherence is exaggerated.

«The cat» is never «alive or dead»—it's a superposition of both states.

Many «theological scientists» would change their perspective if they suspected with Nietzsche that «the living is another form of the dead».

Note from 5/5/2024:

In a two-halves system (50/50), each half has a 50% transparency.

If this system alternates its position (first one half on top and then the other), an observer will notice no variation.

Does this calibrates the observer problem in physics?, that of measurement and the wave-particle duality interpretation, as «someone in free fall justifies the equivalence principle, in fact, could they be the same problem on the path toward quantum gravity?


Automatism, technique and technology are a substitution of vital slavery for mortal slavery. So what are we liberated from today, that AI is evidence of?


Si «no te conoces a vos mismo» aumenta la probabilidad de que tu vida sea una tragedia, no solo como destino, principalmente, como tedio. https://image.nostr.build/6d2fbd9c4041687bc2f3e439780a0f1b3e907d8343b1f35e207cece15425b69c.jpg


Automation is the spoils of the victor. https://image.nostr.build/c6109c00aadd6bd5cea68cc1624422482fe3617b2584876dcb70d946d5bc0856.jpg


A vision is conscious when the innate logic uses the eye. https://image.nostr.build/8a547e21bc675be7f235f8a1a581ed519cfd9bf5215d0de21a160fb6c521c396.jpg


It is the spirit (innate logic) that makes the body and uses it as a means to an end-as a reference and fulcrum with which to transcend. The criticism of dogmatism comes because otherwise these values are inverted.


La música es la totalidad determinando el punto. https://image.nostr.build/f6d415509b9b706e4950347c416ffd166e266f2d3b2a7c683b64188254816989.jpg


In music there is a power with the capacity to transcend. We must also remember that it has at least one virtue: that of the geometrician who relates only the most immediate with the most immediate. https://image.nostr.build/fd6e142f0f7d8714d0e97c8ef0f91ba317ee7c946a19dd676f60173f1a8c7f16.jpg https://image.nostr.build/711b8715245c81b79d2e6bdefba2ad7224de7baac8ee87780fa9dde2e20179f6.jpg https://image.nostr.build/d4243361c3ac3abc0615feb985dcd65e9edd00a9a46ee2352a328a3b713cfa18.jpg https://image.nostr.build/63cf119d7d3c8f9b0dfeab43f241cd4328995ff5e15225699d07219980c25e74.jpg


Between comprehending and killing we find the functional. https://image.nostr.build/741e4239d4f69437300aa35c124f8966c6c40ea7b4b154c26c2e03ed3f8af710.jpg https://image.nostr.build/35bd1d66b7fe34246a52be30b239db234a3f40f33b2b69a8fb13d11f061f44ee.jpg https://image.nostr.build/797106999297d00fc895103391b5ce5025692f3aa656fa1551256a550c212381.jpg


La inspiración nada en el tiempo.


La energía es el «antes al contrario» de la materia.


History and storytelling grow from energy to matter. The jumps become smaller and smaller, the audience is taken into account more and more, until things become easy to understand from matter. https://image.nostr.build/45aeb1f844cf60fd75ad9a434f46beced79702ee4b6b42a2b1f4ef56c45ec649.jpg


Discipline is an unfortunate love.


Already seeing our originality as fantasy is testimony to the "spontaneous, humble, narrow, mediocre, adjusted and justice-dependent" (physiology) perspective from where we see that which is of the greatest range in our existence and the true parable in us of the totality that determines us.


Goethe: “Cuanto más vivo, más deprimente encuentro el espectáculo del hombre, cuya función óptima es ser señor sobre la naturaleza para liberarnos de la necesidad tiránica, haciendo exactamente lo contrario de lo que realmente quiere hacer, y todo debido a alguna noción falsa preconcebida; y al final, debido a que la estructura del proyecto en su conjunto se ha arruinado, simplemente se confunde miserablemente con detalles extraños”.


Las cosas son espejo y reflejo.


Most of the herd is grossly intellectual because it is easy to be so and available even in decadence.


La mayoría de la manada es groseramente intelectual porque es fácil ser así y está disponible incluso en la decadencia.


For a titanic perspective, things are the reflection of the world mixed with pieces of mirror.


Para una perspectiva titánica, las cosas son el reflejo del mundo mezclado con pedazos de espejo.


«Lo menor es menor que lo mayor es mayor» es el corazón de la mecánica cuántica, con esto, como propone mi hermano, damos vuelta de nuevo otra página de la ciencia, y «esta se hace mitología». ¿Qué la sustituye?: el que es la totalidad lo que determina el punto y el punto solo una parábola donde la totalidad se refleja, el espejo, la vida práctica, la apariencia: la completud es simultaneidad, no es origen u objetivo, es los dos al mismo tiempo, y la mecánica cuántica es solo una parábola de esa totalidad que nos determina. Su hermosura, como toda hermosura, es la totalidad reflejada en una esfera menos comprensiva.


Quizás los errores se hacen cada vez más violentos justo antes de solucionarse las cosas, aumentando la circulación porque casi no hay obstáculos, dándose golpes a alta velocidad con los pocos que quedan.


Improving is a habit between divinizing as the foundation and divining as the upper limit.

Mejorar es un hábito entre divinizar como fundamento y adivinar como limite superior.


Appearance is made by agreeing with something visible.


Como el hacer sin algo para hacer es torpeza (sin convenir, sin escuchar, sin mirar el muro de piedra, negando los objetos), el pensar sin algo para hacer exagera. Xz


Religion, art, philosophy and science. Trial and error is a quantum method, you know (you have faith) that something valuable will happen, but you don't know when or how.


Preeminencia vs. Certeza: ¿cómo es que los preeminentes hacen futuro a riesgo?, ¿cómo es que a la Nietzsche los mejores son los que tienen menos probabilidad de sobrevivir?: certeza de estar presente afuera nuestro, en la práctica, lo tiene aquello que en nosotros es menos comprensivo que el mundo, aquello que no puede ser un elemento que no esté en el mundo. En cambio, lo más preeminente de nuestra originalidad, lo más presente en nosotros, es la totalidad de nuestra originalidad, lo más comprensivo en nosotros, es la totalidad de la que la certeza de lo más limitado en nosotros salta como chispa, es la totalidad que siendo no tan poco comprensiva como los elemento que hay en ella, es más parecida al mundo que la comprende, y preeminente sobre nuestras certezas. Conviene deslindar certeza y preeminencia. La preeminencia experimenta la certeza solo como uno de los elementos de su existencia, todos tenemos esta experiencia.


Conformity is the shortest path between two points.


La conformidad es el camino más corto entre dos puntos.


Él no también aparece en simultáneo, aunque sea una carencia: nuestro mundo es uno entre otros, una de las ramas del universo.


Physiology is psychology seen from the outside.


La fisiología es psicología vista desde afuera.


Lo impracticable es inconveniente excepto en esferas poco comprensivas. https://image.nostr.build/e96c53a55c0b4a3b542f15a044fdd484ab555a832a436c78fea1e6a55f72d0b4.jpg


El talento es innato (igualitario) y en la práctica una habilidad (liberal).


Si se ignora lo discreto se confunde.


Discretion is electric. https://image.nostr.build/62cc77885f3e77ee7797e99498c27b1c6258ed6a681892d4221369efc3dbb9de.jpg https://image.nostr.build/6c4279e23771935417320ca4f1e4e4bb6d37cdae2af8c86f88e8bfa8b308691c.jpg


En la etimología está también presente lo que ya no está presente, es una región poblada también con muertos; ahí hay luz, pero también sombra, «hay cultura». La etimología es una cultura pasada que nos muestra un manojo de valores vigentes, lo hace en aquellos que no cambiaron entre ayer y hoy.


Lo valioso de la lógica es que educa para la profundidad. La precisión tiene poco que ver con ella, la rigurosidad y rigidez aparecen porque estamos tratando con cosas que todavía no estamos familiarizados.


Lo valioso de la lógica es que educa para la profundidad. La precisión no tiene nada que ver con ella, la rigurosidad y rigidez aparece solo porque estamos tratando con cosas con las que todavía no estamos familiarizados.


Seguimos siendo trágicos en cuanto el «artista» y el «intelectual» siguen guerreando en vano, por no conocerse a sí mismos y ver como a cada uno le está dado un lugar distinto y complementario: el intelecto toma la posta de las semillas que produce el artista. Como vio bien Jünger, esta es una escisión que cala profunda en la naturaleza.


Cada obra de arte es una semilla, y nada más. https://image.nostr.build/b7515898149150828c3e54e5eb75b565bc4a723bda08a071f814c27ff897ac80.jpg


The problem of the name and the value of naming things well, is given by the distance between the quantum experience that one wants to cultivate and the classical.


Decoherence. We ruin ourselves in order to hide and we hide in order not to ruin ourselves.


Appearance is the good taste of materialists. https://image.nostr.build/943d4ad3e444f6b4f2088b98c722ba3266d855bffb034d2b66b1d812d7999fed.jpg


La apariencia es el buen gusto de los materialistas.


El materialista decide morirse en los sentidos, es su tipo de heroicidad.


Personalities like Trump, Jordan Peterson or Ben Shapiro do not overcome the crystal generation, in practice they strengthen it and that's what they want. You can't compensate the lack of transcendence by wanting to destroy, you have to get out of the issue to overcome the issue.


Estamos cautivados por aquello que vemos por todos lados.


Complexity is the experience of seeing passing through a fixed idea what is actually happening simultaneously.


La complejidad es la experiencia de ver pasar por una idea fija lo que en realidad ocurre en simultáneo.


Jünger: «Los mejores enemigos son los que nos imaginamos». No porque así nos podamos superar, sino porque así podemos superar los obstáculos sin cambiar; mejorar quiere decir vivir acorde a esa imaginación. Colaborar, congeniar, convenir, son todas versiones superiores de guerra.


The categories, genres, and social classes were not invented primarily to segregate or imprison (as many interpret it), but to maintain the integrity of the dream that everyone is a king, accepting the natural differences that occur. https://image.nostr.build/7611784bf8e891559c2335e51b8cec0fea304158f6dcc1fc5c32d1fb8d07a9ef.jpg


Accuracy is a type of acceptance. https://image.nostr.build/648191e10ef1693d08a06b3fc20db0a25a224446e311dabe74150419e394263e.jpg


The echo of an accurate depth does not transform acceptance into pain but into positive radiation, that is to say: not accepting is what transforms a sensation into pain, what is acceptable produces conformal radiation; seen in this way, acceptance as an effort is a compromise of something already compromised.


El límite de muchas lógicas consiste en que la fuerza en la realidad es un espejismo cuando la vemos solo como comparación o igualdad. La verdadera tensión entre las cosas, incluyendo las presentes, viene dada por una relación con nuestros antepasados, y quizás es más fuerte cuanto más distantes son esos antepasados. En comparación con esto, las similitudes entre las cosas son solo un reflejo de esta relación, un espejismo.


It has been pain without danger that has primarily posed a challenge, the invention of unjustified threats, people who create tragedies because they do not know themselves and do not accept pain without danger. Perhaps the best we can do to fully develop ourselves is to deal with infinitesimal limits, which advance completely (that is, ever diminishing), and which end up appearing from the totality, as figures of longer duration.


La habilidad es inversamente proporcional a la distancia; pero no así el crecimiento de la habilidad, que parece beneficiarse de «atraparse en los círculos más amplios»—Nietzsche, —en este «eterno retorno» lo que mejora es la cualidad y calidad, no la cantidad.


El conocimiento es como la gravedad, inversamente proporcional a la habilidad.

La fuerza del conocimiento es similar a la de gravedad, inversamente proporcional a la distancia de la habilidad.


"The ultimate goal would be: to grasp that everything in the realm of fact is already theory. The blue of the sky shows us the basic law of chromatics. Let us not seek for something behind the phenomena—they themselves are the theory."—Goethe


On Earth fruits hang from the senses.


La «ironía, la radiación, el intelecto» son de corto plazo, no importa cuantos compongan su eco, no son más que eso. Uno de los errores extendidos es el confundir lo indispensable con lo superior, cuando lo superior es menos dependiente. https://image.nostr.build/c9068b5d79bbbc05e3a177e779420cc9ebc73994415fc32fe354d7a2f6675e7a.jpg


Primero la simultaneidad y luego la sucesión: ¿hay un sentido oculto en el giro que si no respetamos este orden terminamos viviendo infinitamente a contrapelo?


Inspiration, also when produced by drugs, is a «fantastic» and playful state, a broader range state in the same spectrum-a higher % of the spectrum. But something similar is what happens in the imago, aren't those wings a greater freedom, an ability similar to inspiration: isn't it the same physical phenomenon but in different circumstances?


The wings with which the insect flies after having emerged from the imago are a fantasy present in the interregnum. «Perhaps energy not only is not created or destroyed, it also is not transformed»; the dawn and the dusk occur simultaneously, being transformation and succession the typical superstition of a partial perspective.


Mathematics is valuable in order not to lose convenience in the transition.


He who has ability feels that he knows; that feeling is knowledge.


The separation between appearance and content is a prejudice of those who are short of time.


The road to death is a reflection in the mirror, of death becoming life.


Without equality there is no practice.


To create is as much to figure experiences as to experience figures. The unique remains implicit and explicit, is the content, according to the fact that it did not begin and does not end.


Irony is insidious, it is more «of drama than tragedy», more of pleasure than of «amor fatí»: it is superficial to highlight defects that others overlook.


Expressing completely is the result of repeating logic.


The end serves to multiply from the beginning.


El fuego es más aforístico que sistemático.


Fire is more aphoristic than systematic. https://image.nostr.build/be674040afbdfc56d56e58cb16279e2d62926b86b4f36e7dbff87700d77d408a.jpg


The unique thing is the main thing and the definitive equality.


We see from the world what we carry and we use the world to «see-carry» ourselves.


The end and the beginning are at least equal and at most the same. https://image.nostr.build/77686a03ad58c148dcffbbad8b4b7b79eb6ce69694465c31cc335bfa96b23132.jpg


Today humanity is at a stage in its journey where it confuses convenience with focus. This sentence is an example of this, since in reality we have always had this problem and besides this is not only a problem. The drawback actually might just be in confusing «when» it's not convenient to do it. Perhaps things are also accelerated just «when and where» they are about to settle down, we return to the same thing over and over again more and more quickly, confusing it until it ends up being established. One thing does not take away from the other, the parts are convenient.


Transparency is the negative of presence. https://image.nostr.build/a7069b34ccbcc35d7a7476c9676113e9b661f39775bf9561527ef8344a31d0c6.jpg


The unique distinguishes the infinite, thus creating senses.


Where there is doubt the adaptive capacity is inhibited.


Originality is unique, practice infinite.


The unconscious is a capacity of symmetry and even more of uniqueness. https://image.nostr.build/ab73df4fcf63a70c91401a75f8e8bd2593124712e96d882ccddc32cf7def586b.jpg https://image.nostr.build/7e61d8cd6a5dbcfea19cb570a2c2ab7d2831c0c81a751b99b98de65c983ee780.jpg


Quien hace se dirige a sí mismo, las elites ayudan desde lejos, esta es la verdadera descentralización.

Those who do direct themselves, the elites help from afar, this is true decentralisation. https://image.nostr.build/a4d282badac452596f801146b6292eef3d4a9fb19dd850d64c21566937015dc5.jpg https://image.nostr.build/1814472b5396b1738fd71c127a3496a58f0cd9748964ab1506910a5225adf555.jpg


The observer is constituted of two equal halves but in opposite circumstance «(0)». The similar is a derivative of the symmetrical and the symmetrical of the unique. https://image.nostr.build/c36e32f5202d566ca741a04f7819037e44463656d7f446244fac862c9d7a59e4.jpg https://image.nostr.build/aab3959e7d54363d4c3a6b5c65d9b8d9e803e10cdef6b3ef00ec56944a80614b.jpg


La historia hace transparente las cosas y las atraviesa como si fueran aire. En cambio, si la historia misma es transparente—si la ignoramos, vemos; cualidades y cosas.


History makes things transparent and passes through them as if they were air. On the other hand, if history itself is transparent-if we ignore it, we see; qualities and things.


>>———>
El ser humano no solo es una flecha que apunta más allá de la tierra, es una planta con sus raíces (cabeza) hacia el cielo, como si fuéramos brillantes. Nietzsche: "The formula of my happiness: a Yes, a No, a straight line, a goal."

Human beings are not only an arrow pointing beyond the earth, we are a plant with its roots (head) towards the sky, as if we were shining. Nietzsche: "The formula of my happiness: a Yes, a No, a straight line, a goal".
>>———> https://image.nostr.build/d3384233a9d5919d272ee38296b147ffbede34b33f966a0d55d5b093bd6f3684.jpg


Agrandarse sin límites es dispersarse.

To aggrandise without limits is to disperse. https://image.nostr.build/a5a042d8f54168fcc6f42312d702600ecd9cfe5e9a0a71346454e127c3529d43.jpg


The exhibition of our life, the thing part of reality, the shield and the sword, our works, our convenience, Napoleon's «Victory heals all», are the perfect complement to our logic, the only timeless thing that had to be inverted and detached from its (decentralised) universality in order to locate it.


La parte de «cosa» en el software fue integrado copiando el modelo del hardware, pero este modelo es una inversión de los valores: lo intemporal de lo rígido en el software es lo distribuido, que hace tiempo está intentando de salir a la luz, primero como open-source y ahora como #blockchain o protocolos como #Nostr; esta fuerza inquebrantable de lo distribuido es análogo a la experiencia individual de estar en el centro del mundo, que es un centro no solo exotérico, sino entre «lo mayor es mayor» (hardware, exotérico) «y» «lo menor es menor» (software).


The «thing» part in software was integrated by copying the hardware model, but this model is a reversal of values: the «power-superiority» of the hard in software is the distributed, which has long been trying to come to the fore, first as open-source and now as #blockchain or protocols like #Nostr; this unwavering strength of the distributed is analogous to the individual experience of being at the center of the world, which is a center not only exoteric, but between «greater is greater» (hardware, exoteric) «and» «lesser is lesser» (software).


La voluntad se hace deber donde conviene.


The will becomes duty where it is convenient.


The true luck and saving is the analogy, the parable, which only the genius has. We are original as a simile «of» the origin, not directly equal. Nature coincides even in its smallest details, but in a conformal way. Today it is necessary to re-create savings, hence it is worthwhile to experiment, thus marking a conformal path between the origin and our genius.


The limit jumps over «our eagerness for novelty and curiosity». The shape of this leap is a parabola.


As we become freer, more original, the effects of relating to each other grow exponentially. Perhaps humanity in its greater freedom has ended up affecting wars because at the beginning the passion grows when we take a step closer to the world with our hearts in our hands.


Perhaps the last negativity that anyone is encouraged to rehabilitate is his superiority over others. To do so before its time would have harmed it, since it is a decentralized superiority, a representation of and between «the lesser is less than the greater is greater» and «the greater is greater than the lesser is less». This decentralized being at the center of the world was not overthrown by Copernicus.


Quizás la última negatividad que alguien se anima a rehabilitar es su superioridad sobre los demás. Hacerlo antes de tiempo lo hubiera perjudicado, ya que es una superioridad descentralizada, una representación de y entre «lo menor es menor que lo mayor es mayor» y «lo mayor es mayor que lo menor es menor». Este descentralizado estar en el centro del mundo no fue derribado por Copérnico.


Isn't the main challenge of decentralization that people want centralization? It seems valuable to me to see centralization as the negative of a film that interests us towards a good exposition (decentralization) of our life.


¿El reto principal de la descentralización no es que la gente quiere centralización?; me parece valioso ver la centralización como el negativo de una película que nos interesa hacia una buena exposición (descentralización) de nuestra vida.


Apparition is more than appearance; apparition goes toward convenience; spectres appear as they are convenient. https://image.nostr.build/16a0215480617d8b41fe047cf11ae3dac1334947e835de560ad7cf3b46a9c191.jpg


Money and energy are chickens that lay golden eggs, fearful little geniuses that can make the impossible possible. In them there is a lot of complacency without merit, a recklessness that uses the inversion of values and mysteries to strengthen itself and get closer to the source and logic that produces all works, appearance and radiation (whoever does it like Prometheus too fast, without the necessary mysteries, will later have a tremendous hangover). More than the sun its radiation suits us, but we fall in love with beauty - with that «logic» of the whole in which we are immersed, when we see it reflected in a person, culture or work of art.


Science represents the warrior caste of art.


Lo intelectual y lo humilde son funciones del tiempo, que llevando las obras hacia su mínimo común denominador, liberan originalidad y fortalecen la obra contra la que parecen arremeter.


Laughter, intellectuality and humility are functions of time, which, by bringing works to their lowest common denominator, liberate originality and strengthen the work they seem to attack.


In gold «illusion and disillusion» both conveen.


The lion's roar is the fracture that divides the timeless in time.


The lion's roar is the fracture that divides the timeless in two.


In your best state and at the same time «you are not dependent on things and you are specific»: a range of the total spectrum, a discrete infinity: neither a detail nor anything else.


People imagine the problems they have and find it harder to imagine the problems of others; this with respect to the value of having a personal relationship with the problem; this imagining resonates within mastery.


DALLE https://image.nostr.build/5ddca1b4fb841caacc0fd56ea0d7c448fb2d9f93346cea1177a04901839b73c1.jpg https://image.nostr.build/6fc34c96db49a71bf43a22c250a97948d45edeb11c87c861cb444dee098635a5.jpg


Money and energy are artificial intelligences, impossible things that by treating them as if they were possible, by a sort of inversion of values, with the attractive force of indifference, make possible the impossibility they represent.


Whoever abdicates shaping the world calls it a liar, creates conspiracy theories and is a bit paranoid. This must occur especially in generations in which «freedom only as equal» dominates; these are golden ages that like this material offer to be molded. How does this combine with this other occurrence ?: one shapes it by liberating it from afar.


The compulsion of the individual to start again and again from scratch is intellectual force at work—it does not seem to want to go backwards step by step, but to leap over everything towards originality.


Freedom shapes from afar.


Being in practical terms an atheist, however, I realize that religion is invaluable, because humanity being so full of possibilities, not deifying it until its parallels cross in infinity, makes it live below its own level.


Everything is superior to its occasion ∞ https://image.nostr.build/ff4d22b8cbcc3c6e70f3d9b8fdbae609e392e19c9d737389e2319e3ee011236c.jpg


Copernicus overcame the overvaluation of visual evidence (of the visual over vision), but then accepted it again, as Einstein accepted his own work and then partly denied it; but one more step would lead us to «the lesser is less than the greater is greater», and one more to recognize an “«outside» not only in the beyond but also in the hereafter; this demands a physical theory not of multiple universes but «of two great parts of the universe»; in it, the human being and the earth are restored as the center of the world, as would be any concentration or logic between ««the lesser is less than the greater is greater» and «the greater is greater than the lesser is less»»; the center of the world would now be like the neck between the two horizontal blisters of the hourglass.


One must separate the symbol from its radiation—it will go further but it is not the limited and symbolic logic that created it. Otherwise one remains a new rich of the spirit.


It is valuable to keep things separate and at the same time recognize the conformal relationship between them; thus, «what nature separated on its own» is related in a Dionysian dance that produces transcendence, exponential growth and compound interest.


As the intellect makes the origin just, sleeping and dreaming make the watchman fair and death just life.


The apparent reason of why this or that happens to you is an effect and not the original cause; this effect is the consequence of the crossroads of reason and your reason (reason + your reason), and it happens long before-deep down, without us realizing it.


«The best only once» at a time, a day, a year or a month, and more once in a lifetime than once a year: this has already happened and that is why not knowing about it leads to tragedy.


Effort is an inferior occasion that we treat so comprehensively that it does not accord with the diameter of its own nature, otherwise its treatment would vitalize us, since they are small «sleepings and dreamings» that are there in favor of the whole and our general satisfaction. https://image.nostr.build/c4acbcde71d8c5fcae144caea86e3a1771d7bb41aee5daca83287f2730705ee9.png


Subtle compulsions allow us to completely dominate small spheres that bring hardness to the whole of our life; this is what we do, for example, when we conceptualize, or when we focus on some detail; the fundamental in achieving this consists in the occasion, in the closure of a matter, in making the particular for the general. https://image.nostr.build/c0d2e3c0c217214f4a804a2509c3f36f659577374c8e3805e8cfccca7be1babe.jpg https://image.nostr.build/731b0657bcf928c3a9db08658a1ef1498326907d63c6828825f89849bc1ad7fb.png https://image.nostr.build/ef7e606acfb8a4e944003540d39af643131f9cebd8a3d34fad9e11b7cb1971c8.png


Gratitude is a reflection full of possibilities.


When you have doubts, it is the external world that provides what you lack, so that you can level up in gratitude with the exposure of your life. https://image.nostr.build/c2fc3e557ccc9bff3796ea98678d2efad453e8ad87377be5e5bed5629eda4f91.jpg https://image.nostr.build/e1e22ee17c6bf8d3efbcea2f547621a80a03e104b29e6230b80ad37e17c2d77a.jpg


With some minor corrections:

Perhaps truth is always «equivocal», and it is a criterion of truth that everything that surrounds it agrees with it, speaks of it, as it happens with a symbol.

And perhaps we have to separate «the equivocal» from «the mistake», and propose the hypothesis that the only error is one of direction, "of inversion of values", and that the «equivocal» is in reality, once separated from the direction, a criterion of truth.

Perhaps our originality is conformal to the origin of the world, and this inversion of direction, this having to develop from the inside out and not like reality as a whole from the outside in (seen from our perspective) is already living according to the origin of the world, and not living from the inside out would produce in us a delay.

In this respect religious expectation, «the taste for amulets, the hope that something from outside you will save you, as Georg Jünger would say, would be a retardation, a waiting in vain», since that which we expect from outside in religious expectation has already arrived, it is only that we participate in it in our own way, from «our» logic and origin, from the inside out.


Perhaps truth is always «equivocal», and it is a criterion of truth that everything that surrounds it agrees with it, speaks of it, as it happens with a symbol.

And perhaps we have to separate »the equivocal» from »the mistake», and propose the hypothesis that the only error is one of direction, "of inversion of values", and that the "equivocal" is in reality, once separated from the direction, a criterion of truth.

Perhaps our originality is conformal to the origin of the world, and this inversion of direction, this having to develop from the inside out and not like reality as a whole from the outside in (seen from our perspective) is already living according to the origin of the world, and not living from the inside out would produce in us a delay.

In this respect religious expectation, "the taste for amulets, the hope that something from outside you will save you, as Georg Jünger would say, would be a retardation, a waiting in vain", since that which we expect from outside in religious expectation has already arrived, it is only that we participate in it in our own way, "from our logic and origin", from the inside out.


DALLE https://image.nostr.build/f5ce25b7c9be3ba67686d290c0a2febafc60f75ec05cd1b6f694d3b8fa13f129.jpg


"Perhaps, for example, the reason for the delay is to heighten anticipation. Much like in a show, a touch of suspense, could actually enhance the eagerness to witness the event. This way, when it does begin, it will be greeted with even greater enthusiasm." ?

—- https://image.nostr.build/f40543b9a065c71097dd61ef6dc575e7c00215076d3424c3453ddee1e7caacef.jpg


Technique (and technology) is the worst of the best, close to the point of occasion, at the crossroads, where the best is exhibited.

A good ChatGPT version:

"Technique, being the worst of the best, stands at the threshold of critical decisions, at the crossroads where the essential is revealed. At this juncture, what prevails is the authenticity and inherent freedom in each interaction."


An argument cannot use the origin as a specific justification, since in the titanic and original everything is justified; the specific justification has to do with the surface, the game, the goal and the occasion.


Energy, capital and before that the ether, are all fictions that when treated as real, by a matter of inversion of values, make the impossible possible out of indifference.


By taking original risks you get further than by taking imitative ones; even contrary to appearances the original dangers are less risky and are the ones that truly ensure a future for humanity. https://image.nostr.build/493102b237950af5fa2967188a0fc6db15eda1b42582d870e985a3e3c820d3d4.jpg


hehe, what ?
Don't take this the wrong way, but it seems you haven't grasped yet what I said and you are being (without realizing it) a bit superficial at the moment...


Thnx!

I should clarify that what you quote is not what I said.

More to the Point: for things to work completely, participation is necessary, without participation there is a part that is always missing; in this sense it seems to me that Nostr is a valuable experiment, it allows you to implicitly attribute the origin of a maxim, and allows you to spend less time thanking with words and more time thanking with participation, use, practice; nothing against words, but it seems to me a very interesting experiment to see what happens if one is not «explicitly thanking» for every calorie one ingests, what kind of cultural organism can develop in this way.

I am in favor of recognizing how deep our common originality is and how necessary it is to recognize it in its depth so that we can all grow in power without self-destructing.

I am completely against plagiarism.


Interesting…


One could make a distributed philosophical school using Nostr, AI, Blockchain.

My whole way of thinking is designed so that others can use what I write in their own works «without explicitly attributing it to me», since my way of writing is principal, meta, original, aphoristic.

In the renaissance painters had their colleagues, young people who thus were better initiated in painting by taking advantage of the experience of someone already initiated.

But today this can be done much better, in a more planetary and cosmic way, with more independence, respect, and distance between the sorcerer and the sorcerer's apprentice, in a more cosmopolitan way, as Nietzsche said: "meeting in the widest circles".

The value in this case (philosophy) is to be able to use a well conceived event (aphorism) in your own world and work, but without having to explicitly attribute it to the one who originated it, since the attribution is given automatically and implicitly, because by using Nostr one has an original relationship with all the rest: in this way one can go much further, we can be more comprehensive and perhaps someday be more cosmic than planetary.

Something like this changes everything, and it is part of what is of value in this new expansion of our culture, which among its ramifications, has produced remarkable insights such as those of Satoshi and Fiatjaf.

#Nietzsche
#Satoshi
#Fiatjaf
#growNostr
#philosophy
#nostrphilosophy
#AI
#Blockchain


Doing is the radius of creating.


Something that is annoying of people is when they do not recognize that equality is valuable as conformal equality and not «as being free only as equals»; there has to be an exchange for all values to be worth, for there to be a cosmos; the original is more conformal than the exoteric and superficial, to create is more conformal than to consume.  Ernst Jünger, Esgrafiados: "Equality between free people is not the same as being free only as an equal".  The second equality is ungrateful and unfortunate, one that thanks the superficial radiation and not what generated it, that worships more the exhibited than the totality of references that were involved in creating that fortunate work; it is the problem of the hare that remains bulging in front of an intense spotlight, or that of voluntarily exchanging gold for colored mirrors.


Conformal chaos has a ring to it, also a ring to itself, also a circularity and twist.


One is conformally free and therefore conforms there; and when one squares oneself, what one squares there does so with the totality of references that determine it.


Luxury is a superficial originality.


Moralists are suspicious of the most comprehensive morals; they are suspicious of themselves.


Wars are between inverted values.


In what is alive possibilities are more real than facts.


Statistics is contradicted by the best human examples in history: its error is given (that of the overvaluation of statistics) by the incomprehension of the majority, because a majority can be not very comprehensive by the confabulation of the image with superficiality: what is clear and obvious can also be only for a few.


The technical is a critical culture; it implies the lack of a duration that we want and the possession of another that we want to appreciate.


Hi everyone, Nicolás here; I'll be posting some ideas hopefully contributing something to this interesting mix...

#grownostr
#philosophy


In the vital we also see what is dead, which is why both «humans and animals» can feel animosity towards the artist: human beings cannot live within the entire vital spectrum, but human genius is the vital spectrum, as seen in children and some fortunate adults; everyone is brilliant: the problem lies in the fact that we can be acting foolish for too long.


The value of blockchain consists in being an example of self-sufficiency that allows a better distribution of responsibility, since it is the totality that determines the point; in the case of money and the financial sector blockchain is one more step towards the ethereal (as was the move from the gold standard to "GDP"); and courage & mastery, are they not the power to take steps towards something more intangible and ethereal ?; the development of AI is an experiment with games that produce different syntheses of distributed responsibility.


«Pushing things to the limit»: this is how the parallels «intersect at infinity». So, thinking at the limit is a way of thinking projectively. What bothers us about many of our mistakes is that the solution was right next to us, «like in parallel», and that, with the solutions so close, we can go through a whole lifetime without seeing them. However, we cannot go through an infinity without seeing them, and this is where thinking about things at the limit helps us. Nietzsche liked to think this way sometimes, and so does the remarkable Elon Musk. In them, we see an emphasis on the titanic, typical of our time. This emphasis is one of the few things that Ernst Jünger criticized Nietzsche for: «the timeless is preeminent over the infinite», the power of time grows the less comprehensive the sphere is. It's not a matter of completely disregarding time but of understanding the relative value of what we are dealing with.


Luxury is the exoteric equivalent of origin as probability is the exoteric equivalent of possibility; the question is whether there are more possibilities than probabilities, more originality than luxury; it seems to be so: the original and possible is pre-eminent then over luxury and the probable.