Oddbean new post about | logout

Notes by jamesob | export

 
What's the right name for this dish? I've been calling it "bachelor's surprise" all my adult life 
https://image.nostr.build/3b1523bc8e477840f1f9173ba1b59d48cc4a502c0cc962473c90e18b522f56c8.jpg 
 Ironic to me that the mobile experience on nostr is so far ahead of the desktop equivalent. Mobile is a captured platform; it's bad for our minds and our privacy. We should get off it to the extent possible. 
 Even though the pay elsewhere is better, I absolutely prefer work on Bitcoin Core. It is an inspi... 
 Feel same about bitcoin, but not about work on Core. I'm glad you're not fatigued like me!
 
 In four years we'll have libbitcoinkernel and Core won't be such a bottleneck ;) 
 I made a quick screencast demoing OP_VAULT (BIP-345) with a little prototype wallet I've written in the last few days https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Zwm5iHFyBQ
 
 Hey thanks! Yeah regrettable we can't do this stuff on chain without a softfork. But I think bomb-proof custody is an essential enough use case to justify it. 
 OpenSats is a great target :)
 
 It's a long and pretty boring conversation, and nobody's fault per se. But the phrase "tyranny of structurelessness" comes to mind. Incentives on the development side are not really aligned for longterm success IMO. Bitcoin's project structure is very much an experiment; basically every other major opensource effort has clear leadership structure (if not a BDFL). In bitcoin this would obviously be An Issue (unless there were multiple competing implementations), but the sclerotic and meandering development cycle demotivates talented devs all the same. I've spent five years working on a project that, in commercial settings, would have been merged within a month. It just gets really old.
 
 I talk about it a bit in the second half of the conversation here: https://tftc.io/tftc-podcast/388-op_vault-and-bitcoin-governance-james-obeirne/
 
 Honestly curious to understand more from your perspective. Care to elaborate at all? 
 It's a long and pretty boring conversation, and nobody's fault per se. But the phrase "tyranny of structurelessness" comes to mind. Incentives on the development side are not really aligned for longterm success IMO. Bitcoin's project structure is very much an experiment; basically every other major opensource effort has clear leadership structure (if not a BDFL). In bitcoin this would obviously be An Issue (unless there were multiple competing implementations), but the sclerotic and meandering development cycle demotivates talented devs all the same. I've spent five years working on a project that, in commercial settings, would have been merged within a month. It just gets really old.
 
 Complete OP_VAULT prototype/demo wallet almost finished. Gonna record a screencast
 in the next few days. 
 If the pay wasn't good, I absolutely would not be working on Bitcoin Core. It is a miserable project. 
 It's not a great indicator for bitcoin!
 
 Nostr will only take off when nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9... 
 Not out of the realm of possibility  
 Can someone explain why in God's name you'd want to host your calendar on nostr? 
 Nostr is both frustrating and invigorating. I'm on the cusp of writing a desktop client because the current options are pretty rough. 
 Yup, filed some issues, PR