11 months since we launched "Fraudcoin - 1000 Years of Inflation as a Policy" and readers' reviews are 5.0 out of 5.0 on the 2 biggest bookstore chains' webshops, while it has climbed from 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5.0 on Amazon. Thank's a bunch for your support 😍

https://image.nostr.build/8d78581bf1a48cace58426ebe809ecb58cad32397ab91d4b7604bd931f2a6875.jpg


When young people ask for advice, I tell them to avoid borrowing money. I explain that if they do that, they plug themselves into a system that allows a small elite to feast on them.


Rebel up


I'm a Trønder, all of my ancestors were Trønders, and my genes will always be screaming about individual sovereignty and freedom.


Note on Sapiens, by Y. HARARI.

Just like the textbooks used at all levels in our education system, with very, very few exceptions, don't provide any information about monetary policy and inflation and the effect it has on citizens, the economy, distribution of wealth, politics and civilization, Yuval Harari does the same in his bestseller "Sapiens - A brief history of humankind".

What can you say about a book that is supposed to give an introduction to our history when it doesn't present the most fundamental of all policies - the exorbitant privilege of printing money out of thin air?

Answer: You can neither trust the book's content, nor its author.

https://image.nostr.build/4594f83a06ec012dec1f329835141ee4a2a653dc8b895acde7e22d6f8c30e3d8.jpg


US history after the Constitution and the Bill of Rights is a great warning to those who want to "improve the Code"


I wonder if the historic reason for the Western elite's hatred towards Russia is due to the Soviet Union not ratifying the Bretton Woods system after World War II concluded in 1945, although they had signed the agreement in July 1944.


Well put


Simply put, the combination of
-  Chrstianity with one god
-  the king becoming God's representative, religious leader and protector of the parish, which would be the people of Norway
- the concept of heaven and hell

was the complete opposite of what they had prior to that. This lowered people's time preference in several ways, most notably be taking their focus away from the importance of protecting your own bloodline. When they didn't have any promise of eternal life after death, as it was with their former religion, their focus would naturally be on honor, grateness and the name of their own family.

It's kins of counterintuitive, because the Norse religion has been seen as something barbaric, while Christianity was more human.

I guess it matters a lot how you practice your religion.

But of course, the king wouls try to corrupt Christianity and remodel this religion into becoming political tools, "weaponizing" the religion you might said.

And this paved the way for weaponizing the money.

The rest is history, as they say.


As some of you know I believe Bitcoin can give us back monetary freedom again; that is, the right to use the money we like best.

I hold this freedom to be the single most important of them all.

And as I've said repeatedly, my ancestors in Trøndelag were probably living in the part of the civilized world in the West that managed to keep their monetary freedom the longest.

They lost it in 1050 AD with Harald Hardråde's killing of Einar Tambarskjelve.

It's beginning to sink in with me what the most important reason was:

A lowering of my ancestors' time preference, over a period of approximately two generations, or about 60 years.

This was probably enough to make them betray their simple code, which in essence  said that every Trønder was obliged to kill the King who didn't rule by consent.

Once the betrayel was a fact, there was no turning back.

We ended up with which soon will be a full 1000 years of tyranny, where we have got small ruling class, and one big class of serfs.

That's a fakin big price to pay for betraying the code.

Unforgiveable.

But explainable.

Now, this change, which happened over the 60 years prior to 1050 AD, probably had everything to do with religion.

And herein lies the challenge:

Revealing this analysis in Arrow of Truth will probably make many people pissed at me.

So be it.

It's more important to learn from the story.

People being mad at me is unimportant in this perspective.

The social layer of Bitcoin is what may constitute Bitcoin's weakest link.

And if we don't learn from the past, we are bound to live with a high risk of repeaing the same mistake.

I'd rather would like to avoid that, if I could.

https://image.nostr.build/7aaffb18f0124933770aa08c224b0b8bd896ff12b61844cd1094445804de5769.jpg


Erna Solberg,  who currently finds herself smack in the middle of a potential insider trading scandal that occured while she was Prime Minister of Norway, hired billionaire Nicolai Tangen, who is an avid WEF supporter, Yuval Harari admirer and proponent of 100% inheritance tax, to run the world's second largest sovereign wealth fund, the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global.

She hired him because of his "competence".

I don't think so. I think someone found out that she was involved in the scandal, and that powerful people outside the government took the decision to install Tangen.

She probably wasn't very sceptical to the idea though, being a strong supporter of Klaus Schwab's project herself.

Our government is run by bewildered hens and obediant dogs.

They're not on the people's side.

https://image.nostr.build/8e485c63e7630a26670c8451716188ce8d3fa99e488561f3cda90d02aa464218.jpg


One of the most impactful Simply Bitcoin episodes so far

https://spotify.link/1PkJVSOB8Cb


Milei:

"The Joy Is Endless"

https://image.nostr.build/bdd0f2f00a5225e2947b6f1b2c05f615f862b74509dde2e083fb423845d43df1.jpg


Vi satte prosjektet på pause, og iom at det skjer så mye i verden er det litt arbeid som gjenstår. Parallelt øker forståelsen, og det er viktig å få dette til å treffe 100%


This book is going to explain the importance of not changing a code that works. My people learned this the hard way, and look where we are today.
#Bitcoin

https://image.nostr.build/7aaffb18f0124933770aa08c224b0b8bd896ff12b61844cd1094445804de5769.jpg


Thx, I'll check it out


I don't want a revolution. I just wan't Norway out of all international agreements, Trøndelag out of Norway, and to reintroduce our old law which said that every Trønder has a duty to kill a King who takes people's property without the consent of the Frostating. No big deal.


CPI = Counterfeiters' Public Image

Moneysupply M2 = Counterfeiters' true rate of profit


Yup


Halfway through your book after Micheal Keag of Bitcoin powerhouse recommend it to me. What a fascinating read, you should write a chapter on 2023 after it's been said and done. 👍😀


Thx. Glad u like it. The next book (on bitcoin) will partly be a follow-up which includes info up to date as of this autumn. The two books will be a good match


2023 will first of all be remembered for #scamflation


If the Code promotes peace and prosperity - don't change it.


Yesterday, in the Duran Report, Dr. Jeffrey Sachs complained about a total lack of diplomatic skills within the US, UK and EU administrations. Let me suggest that they attend one of the courses provided by our Minister of Foreign Affairs, Anniken Huitfeldt. Here you see her instructing a group of students in Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's funeral seremony in September last year. (Please note that this is the advanced level).

https://image.nostr.build/d8768c1dc3d1979c1f974cae176d1e7b4644ca91b5abff919598fb8941b9696e.jpg


The Age of Cryptography


The Age of the Dollar was conceived in war.

https://image.nostr.build/e5a744440513a86ccda4207266b2d290007de513f24ac404fd3febaa176533d2.jpg


Satire


The youth, our kids and the future generations owe us nothing. I hope they learn many languages, the skills of mastering AI and Bitcoin, go out in search of freedom and leave the mess that we have created, so that we can clean it up ourselves. Serving them as fodder to the cannons in wars on foreign or home soil or forcing them to inherit any debt or other obligations isn't an option.


Meat-based plants is the future


Today we have local and regional elections in Norway, and I've just performed my civic duties 🫡.

This inspired me to make a run for office in our parliamentary election in 2025. Please find my draft platform:

I promise that the policy of

- grinding you between the millstones of taxation and inflation,
- lying in both of your ears simultanously,
- vaccinating your pregnant wife,
- locking up your granny,
- ripping out your tongue,
- confirming your child's gender,
- knocking out your teeth,
- regulating to death all useful services,
- poisoning your food,
- dripping ether into your eyes,
- painting all public building in the rainbow's colours,
- sawing the seeds of distrust between you and your friends, and
-  ensuring that all of your descendants forever will be enslaved by perpetual debt

will continue, in the name of the  greater good.

Vote for Rune Østgård
The Same Shit as all the other parties party (SS)

(It's a slam dunk. )

https://image.nostr.build/1ae5731a297e8b1df921991a67df8e7994f697dfc1111a2034bdb79de8837562.jpg


be bitcoin
nostr:nevent1qqstzmglezs6dd3m5hf6n5mekgswuznccfh870zgtplru6yge0d7lmspz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzpqe29v7w7jch2nz2w4efvjjymdjdr8klvflvg5tek5vapf02aqveqvzqqqqqqy9kessm


Monetary policy and war are the strongest wealth extraction mechanisms that exist.

Monetary policy fuels the wars.

So if you want to end the wars and the extraction of people's wealth, you have to support the end of monetary policy and begin supporting monetary freedom.


The bigger the state gets the more people want to be the state.

The more popular #Bitcoin gets the less people want to be the state.


Don't overthink it.

1. Humankind = kind human

Don't believe those who say we need rulers to run our lives because we are evil and selfish.

2. Sound money = freedom

Don't believe those who say we need rulers to decide what we should use as money.

Don't overthink it.


Acersaken, Høyesterett og det store strømsviket

I disse dager behandler Høyesterett søksmålet mot staten i Acersaken. Nei til EU mener at avståelsen av norsk suverenitet til EUs energibyrå ACER er grunnlovsstridig. Derfor har de gått til sak mot staten. Saken startet den 5. september.

De fleste er historieløse og vet ikke hvordan norske politikere og særinteressene kom i posisjon til å selge ut norsk vannkraft og å mangedoble strømprisene for nordmen.

Her får du en kjapp gjennomgang av det viktigste. Det skjedde for litt over hundre år siden, det vil si lenge før både EU og EØS.

Retten til å produsere kraft var opprinnelig en del av eiendomsretten til grunneierne. På starten av 1900-tallet begynte noen av dem å selge eller leie bort rettighetene sine, blant annet til utenlandske selskaper.

Nyheten om disse avtalene ble et påskudd for politikerne om at de skulle verne om "norske" ressurser slik at de ikke ble "solgt ut av landet". Dette var imidlertid bare den formelle begrunnelsen.

Den reelle begrunnelsen var at politikerne og de særinteressene som de representerte ønsket å frata norske grunneiere kontrollen over ressursene. De var grådige, og ønsket å overta ressursene gratis.

Fra 1906 til 1917 innførte det norske Stortinget en serie konsesjonslover for vannkraft og andre naturressurser.

Lovene ga staten vide fullmakter til å sette betingelser for utbygging og utnyttelse av norske vassdrag.

De som ville produsere kraft måtte søke om konsesjon. Konsesjonsperioden var fra 1917 på 50 år.

Lov av 18. september 1909 om ervervelse av vannfall, bergverk m.v. bestemte at myndighetene skulle ha rett til å overta et anlegg uten betaling når konsesjonstiden var ute.

Grunneierne gikk til sak mot staten og mente lovene var i strid med grunnlovens vern av eiendomsretten.

I et skammens kapittel i norske domstolers historie forkastet Høyesterett i 1918 søksmålet, og ga staten medhold.

Dette er hovedårsaken til at den norske staten, fylkeskommunene, kommunene og offetlig eide bedrifter som eier vannkraftverk og overføringsnett i dag kan selge kraftproduksjonen ut av landet.

Konsekvensen er samtidig at nordmenn importerer de europeiske prisene tilbake til Norge. Dermed er det norske borgere og bedrifter som må betale regningen, mens det offentlige eser og eser og eser ut.

Merk deg at det ikke er noen ironi her. Det var hele tiden meningen å bruke politisk makt over kraftressursene. Og det har de da også klart - til gangs.

Etter min oppfatning er Acersaken  Høyesteretts siste sjanse til å vinne tilbake tilliten hos det norske folk når det gjelder energipolitikkens ødeleggelser. Det var Høyesterett som i 1918 satte norske politikere i den posisjonen som de utnytter på det groveste i dag. Nå har Høyesterett mulighet til å rette opp feilen.

Jeg er imidlertid ikke optimist. Sett over et lengre tidsspenn har Høyesterett vært en tilrettelegger for at statens makt bare kan øke og øke, til skade for det norske folks frihet.

Ved å godta lovene har de gitt politikernes inngrep legitimitet, mens Ola Nordmann har stått og sett på med lua i hånden.

Hvis man skal lære noe av historien kommer flertallet av Høyesteretts dommere til å falle ned på at det enkle ofte er det beste også i Acersaken.

***
Hvis du syns at du lærte noe er det fint om du trykker liker og følger meg.


National currencies are debt money, a.k.a. analogue shitcoins. You must be a finance wiz working for the government to think that piling digital shitcoins like CBDCs on top of a landfill with analogue shitcoins will be a great idea. Good luck, schmuck.


Our Belief System, The Monetary System and the American Hegemony

Civilization scales in layers. Layer zero is the people’s belief system. Layer one is the monetary system. The other parts of a civilized society scale upon the monetary system.

Today’s world order is effectively a hegemony ruled by the US. This piece dives into the following questions:
What was the belief system and the monetary system that formed the basis for the American hegemony? And what is it that makes this hegemony so vulnerable today?

To get the proper perspective we have to look back in time.

The first example of government monopolization and political debasement of money was probably the Greek citystate of Athens, some 2500 years ago.

It’s difficult to know what it was with their belief system that led to this decision. But the state used the policy to finance its ambitions to rule others and the Peloponnesian war against Sparta.

In the end Athens lost, but the inflation policy spread.

The Roman empire also financed its wars in part by debasing the silver coins. Many books and articles have been written about how the inflation policy also brought it to it’s knees.

We don’t know for sure which belief system that was the basis for the Romans’ choice of monetary system, but once more we see it’s intrinsically linked to war and domination.

My region, Trøndelag, in the middle of Norway, probably was one of the last civilized areas in the West that had monetary freedom – the right to use whichever money people liked best. The people used money from many other countries and they preferred money with a high share of silver or gold.

We don’t know for sure which belief system this freedom was based on. But it was likely closely linked to the fact that the Trønders loved their freedom and hated kings.

It has been said that the Frostating law’s resistance provisions, which secured the freedoms of the Trønders, was unique. I’ll explain shortly what these provisions said, but let me just say that I find it very likely that it has been the same principles that have governed every free society before they fell under the rule of kings and their inflation policy.

The resistance provisions basically obliged each and every Trønder to kill the king, if the king took someones property without the consent of the Frostating, which was the regional court and assembly of free farmers and landowners in Trøndelag.

If the King didn’t adhere to this rule and lay claim to someone’s property it was also the duty of each and every Trønder to pass on the war arrow that would be cut, bring it to the neighbor, and saddle up, ready for hunting down the King and his men.

Our royal sagas has strangely enough preserved a story that demonstrates the effectiveness of my ancestors’ rule of resistance: In the 8th century AD they were invaded by King Øystein of the Uplands. He appointed his son as King of Trøndelag and went home.

As soon as the Trønders got the opportunity, they killed their new king. The reason was probably that the resistance provisions still applied, and that the duty to kill the king didn’t stop when the war ended.

These principles ensured two things, that kings had little or no power in Trøndelag and that the people enjoyed monetary freedom. This suddenly came to an end in 1050 AD when King Harald Hardråde took power, immediately introduced inflation as a policy and readied his country for war. It all came to a bloody conclusion in 1066 in the Battle of Stamford Bridge. King Hardråde lost the war, many thousand Norwegians were killed, and the Viking Age came to an end.

We see that the monetary freedom was based on a simple code of conduct: Kill the King who doesn’t rule by consent. If you didn’t obey the code, you would be punished with harsh fines. You would probably also lose the privilege of being protected by your neighbors.

The inflation policy, on the other hand, was based on King Hardråde’s political ambitions, most fundamentally his obsession with  ruling over as many peoples as possible, including the English.

We have later had a few examples of monetary freedom, in the golden age of the Dutch in the 17th and the early 18th century, and a de facto policy of monetary freedom in the US in parts of the 19th century.

In the Netherlands this rule grew out of the rebellion against tyrannic inflationist kings and emperors. The rebels were inspired by monetary freedom traditions that could be traced back to the 8th century AD in a part of India that was ruled by Muslims.

In the US, the de facto principle of monetary freedom was indirectly protected by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which secured that the state would have very little power over the people, at least when it was compared with the inflationist monarchies of Europe. It was probably of great help that several of the founding fathers meant that inflation was a crime against humanity.

The combination of the 200 year long tradition with central banking in Europe and the introduction of the gold standard across the whole wide world in the 1870s undermined the de facto principle of monetary freedom in the US. When the Federal reserve, the first real central bank in the US, was created, and the World War I broke out on the 28 July 1914, the last nails were hammered into the coffin of monetary freedom.

From that day on, we have in reality been on a globally coordinated inflation policy, first dictated by the British, and later by the Americans.

To sum up what we have looked at so far, monetary freedom has grown out of peoples’ desire of freedom in general, and the acknowledgement of the simple fact that you are obliged to fight for your freedom if you want to keep it. We can call it the Code of Resistance.

On the other end, the inflation policy goes hand in hand with war, aggressive foreign policy and suppression of individual freedom. We can call it the Code of Coercion.

These two very distinct monetary systems and the codes that they are based on, spring out of two very different belief systems – individual freedom and worship of the state.

Let's now jump forward to today’s system. The specific geopolitical system that we have now, is scaled upon a very specific monetary system, which again is scaled upon a very specific belief system.

The geopolitical system that we have today is what American neocons, such as Biden, Blinken and Nuland, often refer to as «the rule based order». This is in essence a system of American hegemony where the US dictates what the rest of the world is allowed to do.

The American hegemony is scaled upon the monetary system that we basically can call «the dollar standard». In practice this system implies that the US and it’s closest allies, which are mainly all the English speaking countries, the EU and Norway, inflate their currencies in a controlled manner, meaning – at a tempo that isn’t too high.

This enables them to maintain relatively strong currencies. In turn, this enables the US to force its inflation upon the rest of the world. Their most valuable export commodity is the US dollar, which the Federal reserve and the private banks «print out of thin air».

In return, the rest of the world exports commodities and various other goods and services back to the US.

The euro area countries to some extent enjoy the same benefit with the euro, which is the second biggest global currency.

The rest of the worlds’ governments enjoy the benefits of inflation too, but their policy is more concentrated. With the consent of the US and the EU they debase their currencies at a high speed. This extracts most of their own people’s wealth, into the state coffers and the pockets of the country’s wealthy elites. At the same time it ensures that their currencies have low value compared with the USD and EUR. This, in turn, means that the USD can continue to enjoy its status as the world’s dominant currency.

If we simplify our analysis, the global dollar standard can be defined as a symbiosis between the US and it’s right to exploit the rest of the world by exporting its inflation, and the other countries’  right to exploit their own people by debasing currencies that to a much less degree is used beyond the borders of the national states.
The effect has, among others, been that very few developing countries, which mainly consist of former colonies, have been able to build capital and become industrialized. Lyn Alden and Alex Gladstein have been instrumental in sharing this knowledge with the rest of us.

This brings us to the next subject: Layer zero today.

The first question we need to ask is which specific belief system it was that the dollar standard was scaled upon.

In such a short piece I will once more have to resort to simplifications, and I’ll first zoom in on the birth of the dollar standard.

Today’s monetary standard was conceived in war. When the Bretton Woods conference took place in July 1944, it was relatively clear that the allied forces would win World War II, but that this  depended on the continued support from the US.

The 44 allied states who attended the conference established a quasi gold standard. In practice it meant that the Americans could inflate its currency using gold as a fractional reserve. In turn the other countries could inflate their own currencies, using dollar holdings as a fractional reserve.

All of the countries, including Soviet Union, agreed on these principles and signed the treaty. I would say that the belief system that underpinned this decision, that is – of the country’s rulers, likely was, firstly fear, because if they didn’t support the proposal the US could make it more difficult to end the war, and secondly, greed, because there in reality wouldn’t be much of a restraint on their ability to extract wealth from their own citizens via the inflation policy.

What happened next was that the US delivered on their promise to end the war. However, they did much more than that. When American airplanes dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, the US administration also demonstrated an unprecedented ruthlessness. This must have aggregated peoples’ fear of the new superpower.

It can be no doubt that this aggressiveness made it easier for all of the parties to the Bretton Woods agreement – with the exception of the Soviet Union – to ratify the treaty. On the 27 December the agreed upon threshold of signatories was met and the establishment of the quasi gold standard was a fact. Russia joined the Bretton Woods system in 1992, following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

While the dollar system was conceived in war and a final act of terror, it would for a long period be maintained first of all due to greed and fear. The fear part needs a few comments.

When the Soviet Union abstained from ratifying the Bretton Woods agreement, this went hand in hand with Stalin’s ambitions to further the idea of national and international communism. The combination of the cold war and the many proxy wars between the two super powers that followed after World War II, meant that the Western countries and most of the rest of the world solidified their support of the dollar based monetary system.

Thus, fear of global nuclear war, and dependence on US military protection against the Soviet Union, was the belief system that the dollar system now was scaled upon.

When the Soviet Union and the East Bloc countries imploded, the US neocons took the concious decision to support some countries, such as Poland, financially, but not to do the same to Russia. The consequence was that hyperinflation broke out in Russia. This sparked political turmoil, which paved the way for a weak oligharchical political system that would keep the Russian bear dormant for a long period.

At the same time, the US neocons established close ties to China. The deal was basically that the Russians should be shoved into the cold, that China should accept dollars as payment for consumer goods and buy US treasuries, in exchange of the US making it easy for Americans to buy Chinese goods.

The flipside of what later has been described as the «Chinese Miracle» was that the Americans were turned into consumers who deindustrialized their domestic economy.

It can be argued that the belief system that the dollar system was scaled upon during the last 30 years to a large extent was consumerism and a continued effort to ensure that Russians was perceived as a threat to the west.
As Lyn Alden points out in her recent book, Broken Money, the dollar standard has also been kept alive by military intervention in countries that tried to opt out of the dollar, and American-led economic sanctions.

What happens today is that the dollar system runs out of legs, and effectively stears into the abyss. The six features described below are IMO the most important driving forces:

1. The enormous US public debt, which has been monetized by the Federal Reserve’s and other central banks’ moneyprinting.The debt currently sits at about 130% of GDP. Many leading economists today argue that the debt is unsustainable, and that it will continue to rise as the federal government is forced to print money to pay interest and cover other costs, such as the unfunded liabilities caused by the social security system and more. This constitutes what we can call a threat of internal economic implosion, which was the fate that the Soviet Union and the East Bloc countries succumbed to.

2. The reduced ability of the US to weaponize the dollar, due to deindustrialization and a significantly lower manufacturing capacity that the US needs to wage wars that can support the dollar’s dominance.

3. The BRICS countries want out of the system. This constitutes a decentralized threat on a global level against «the rule-based order».

4. The ongoing polarization inside the US federal republic, where some of the states dominated by the Republicans have decided that gold and silver is legal tender, support Bitcoin mining and block the introduction of CBDC. This happens at the same time as they wake up and realize that the exorbitant moneyprinting since before the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, has reallocated a significant share of the wealth from people who define themselves as Republicans to people who say that they are Democrats. (H/t to Balaji S. Srinivasan, who has shed light on this in recent podcasts). This constitutes a threat of internal political implosion.

5. The increased flight of capital into the two escape hatches of gold and Bitcoin. These systems constitute a threat against the dollar in terms of being competing monetary technologies.

6. The rapid distribution of knowledge about money and the effects of inflation as a policy. This constitutes a decentralized threat against the system, at a citizen level.

Although it takes time to stop the dollar dominance, the combined effect of these 6 pressure mechanisms is extremely powerful.

I believe that it again will be the belief system that decides which monetary system our children will have in the future. People’s knowledge about the effect of the inflation policy, item No. 6 above, is going to drive the processes described in No. 1 to 5. I believe that this is the main motivation when the US government and its allies currently spend so much political capital on limiting free speech.

As these developments unfold, I have decided to take on the role of an activist, or prophet if you like, who preaches the following two simple principles:

1.	Civilization scales in layers. The people’s belief system is layer zero. The monetary system is layer one. The other parts of a civilized society scale upon the monetary system.

2.	There are only two alternative monetary systems. On the one hand, we have monopolization of money with a forced standardization of which money that people can use.  And on the other hand, we have monetary freedom, the right to use the money that we like best.

I have taken upon me to play this role, because I think these two principles represent perspectives that to little extent are reflected in the public debate today.

Although there is a growing realization of the fact that the monetary system has a huge effect on society, and that the current system is intrinsically antithetical to freedom, the significance of the system for the functioning of civilization and how it relates to our belief system is undercommunicated. By emphasizing this, I hope it can inspire people to focus on these two core principles when they dedicate their time and energy to changing today’s policy. I am convinced that having such a lazer-eyed focus will speed up the process.

Regarding the choice of monetary system, we basically have three camps today:

-	The «fiat» camp, who consists of people who support the current system,

-	The «goldbugs», who support the idea of reintroducing gold as a global reserve currency, and

-	The «Bitcoiners», who hope Bitcoin can become a new global reserve currency.

Unfortunately, the «monetary freedom» camp is almost non-existing. The main reason for this, I believe, is the following:

-	Rulers have carefully made sure to remove the traces of monetary freedom as a core feature of free civil societies

-	The political elite has gaslighted the people with false economic theories and ensured that we have a total lack of education of the general public concerning the evils of inflation.

Luckily we still have a few resources about monetary freedom, which I also have described in Fraudcoin.

This should suffice for now. My upcoming book, Arrow of Truth - from Forseti to Satoshi, will shed more light on these developments throughout history, as well as on the importance of Bitcoin in shaping the future of our belief system and in turn, our monetary system.

***

Thank you for reading. Feel free to share it with others, here and in other forums.

And if you liked this piece, I appreciate that you hit the like button and follow me.


Message to the youth:

- vote with your feet
- avoid inflation
- seek truth
- build relations
- understand gold and bitcoin