Thank you for feedback.
There are still risks, we were talking about the risk of the project not taking off.
But let's discuss your risk analysis:
1. and 2. are still risks
3. possible, low probability, but that does not mean Bitcoin goes away. Even if it flips over, there will be people that want to stay in Bitcoin. When countries introduced instant payment and better "distribution qualities" of fiat, there still were enough people who held to gold, just because they trust it more.
4. that is a risk of something that will happen, but that will not kill bitcoin as a project. There is now enough hodlers that they will just play in their own sandbox regardless of splits.
5. This is similar to 2. Yes, it's a risk, but not to bitcoin, but to its users. Market will react with better security solutions.
6. Outlawing is not a risk to bitcoin, but to some users. There are many countries where bitcoiners can flee to and they will have mean to do it. It will also show how the use-case of bitcoin (free movement of capital and self custody) works and solves this problem for users. Bullish (not necessarily for price, but for use-case, what Bitcoin is for).
7. that will certainly test Bitcoin's antifragility, bullish.
The designer for our paper Nocoiner Syndrome is lit. We are very grateful for the visual identity of the paper, including the notes on the margin. And also for managing the printing. You can find printed editions of No Coiner Syndrome at some of the cool conferences over the coming months.
Check his web and portfolio and contact him if you need amazing visuals for your project:
Web:https://nogoodkid.com/
Portfolio:https://dribbble.com/nogoodkidnostr:note1xd4qkxgvmnwm9wd5a6x2el9fudna5kjtrv8s4teqrv6tzrwftr4qcwal4u
The nocoiner syndrome is not simply having no Bitcoin. Most people on this planet as of this writing have no Bitcoin. Some don't know about it, some have not invested enough time to learn about it, and some do not want or need it for its properties.
The nocoiner syndrome is a condition under which a person perceives early adopters of Bitcoin as immoral. Often, this condition stems from their perception that early Bitcoin adopters in their vicinity have quickly become extremely wealthy, by not producing anything, "just buying Bitcoin". The root cause of this syndrome is perception of a "missed train" and further justification of why Bitcoin itself and also the early adopters are bad, immoral, or misguided.
To be diagnosed with the nocoiner syndrome, individuals must actively oppose and judge Bitcoiners. This often involves hiding trauma from past dismissals of Bitcoin as unworkable or harboring suppressed feelings like 'we missed this train' or 'it is too late.' This leads to animosity towards Bitcoiners.
https://cryptoanarchy.institute/nocoiner-syndrome-2024.pdf
We are pleased to announce our research paper "Nocoiner Syndrome", which analyzes this condition where individuals, especially those benefiting from the current financial system's Cantillon Effect, perceive early Bitcoin adopters as immoral.
It is based on a case study of certain individuals working for European Central Bank and investigating several "issues" with Bitcoin. As they have all the symptoms to be diagnosed with late progression of nocoiner syndrome, we decided to help people understand this condition and possible treatments.
Please spread widely to help those in need: https://cryptoanarchy.institute/nocoiner-syndrome-2024.pdfhttps://cryptoanarchy.institute/nocoiner-syndrome-preview.jpeg
Hello Nostr! We are a think tank that provides state of the art research, policy papers and decentralized knowledge, in a search of deeper wisdom emerging from complex decentralized systems.
Check out our website: https://cryptoanarchy.institute/
Oddbean new post about login | logout
Notes by Institute of Cryptoanarchy | export