Just putting this out there, in case people forget:

Unicode is a *text* encoding standard. 

 Pondering whether this late 19th Century non-looped form of Abkhaz Ҩ ҩ would be acceptable today in a similar style of type?

https://typo.social/system/media_attachments/files/111/150/884/034/879/920/original/fa3d0d57647bd251.png

https://typo.social/system/media_attachments/files/111/150/898/293/679/311/original/42c5a744682a6a94.png 

 I seeeee you.

https://typo.social/system/media_attachments/files/111/133/764/769/461/590/original/163878068373bee4.png 

 Sometimes it is hard to raise the energy to design letters for an alphabet that I know was only used between 1918 and 1931.

https://typo.social/system/media_attachments/files/111/128/678/498/981/629/original/e8abe64031e94edd.png 

 The Unicode Consortium is hosting an online ‘open house’ on script and character encoding: an opportunity to learn about the process and criteria for encoding, and to ask questions of @roozbehp and other experts.

17 September 11:00 Pacific

Registration information:
https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZ0vd-GhpzMvHtX4Y_eL0NvwvBUpLVvLlHi_#/registration