Look these original photos 👀owned by one of my friends. These are from 1966... John, Paul, George, Ringo and Brian Epstein.
 https://image.nostr.build/0519421d862c7b2b3cbec10a83d70ed45c4036c5c0502a3c6710b4c76f53a936.jpg

#beatles #photo #picture #photograpy #art #artstr #artwork


Wow, the Beatles. Almost 60byears.

nostr:nevent1qqspapke27l60dw4ucmw54lgufuja6h3wf68e95mnhmrvslgud27lhsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsf9psvcxx9jt9uzrwmrt7r822ng3d6653k3hmaq3s5xa50wjakcjsrqsqqqqqpexhfnk


Ok ...but the high fees 🤔


Resignantion crisis in Hungary:
The President and the former Justice Minister resigned, because
the President pardoned to a person involved in a pedophile case.

Meanwhile the ex-husband of the former Justice Minister, as an "insider" gave an interview about corruption cases, and more about the PM's best friend and about the PM's son-in-law

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68285304

#crisis #scandal #pedophile #resignation #corruption


GM to you GA for me 🙂


Ohhh.. Black humour 😁


Zap-share is a terrible revenue model for sustaining a Nostr Client. We must find a better way to align our applications with the user's interest.

This is a long form article, you can read it in https://habla.news/a/naddr1qqghyetk94eksctjv5khxmrpwejhy7gzyprqcf0xst760qet2tglytfay2e3wmvh9asdehpjztkceyh0s5r9cqcyqqq823c33m8ht

Sending a percentage of your zaps to head straight to your Client's development team, optionally or forcibly, sounds like a great way to sustain a project. And, depending on the team's career goals, it is. However, I am here to argue that this revenue model doesn't serve us well.

Let's be real: if you are developing a client and seeking venture capital, then yes, rev-share is by far your best shot at winning. It's a hot favorite in venture pitches because it hands the company (and its investors) control over the entire field while raking in maximum revenue from all participants. Your performance metrics are very well established, incentives are aligned with the fast-scaling needs, the path to growth is very common and many, many investors know the territory extremely well and will be more willing to easily give you money. If that is your case, go for the usual route of YC -> VC -> PE -> IPO. You won't control anything in the end, but it will make you, and your investors, a lot of money.

That being said, I believe this revenue model bakes in the wrong incentives, and forward-thinking clients should seek alternative revenue-generation strategies.

Storytime: Over the past 15 years, I led a medical device business that integrated a rev-share component. Doctors purchasing our devices gained access to our medical record system. The revenue model for that system was rev-share: the system itself was essentially free, and each time providers submitted a prescription, we earned $0.50. Initially, this model thrived because it scaled with our customer's needs. If they were small businesses, their payments would stay small, proportional to their bumpy use. $0.50/patient was something everyone could afford out of their insurance payouts. It was great for beginners, great for large players, and great for us. Things looked great. But little did I know what it would do to the business. Gradually, our focus shifted from developing devices and enhancing the system to obsessing over increasing the number of prescriptions. We ended up staying quite small as a business, but even at that small size, I could already see the damage the revenue model could make at scale. If we grew, it would be all about how to get providers to file as many prescriptions as possible, even for patients who didn't need one. Controlling the medium upon which customers file prescriptions gives the company immense power to incentivize behaviors that will go against the well-being of the community.

Similar tendencies are visible in other platforms like Substack nowadays. You can't visit your favorite author without being constantly "reminded" to subscribe to other creators. It doesn't matter if you care or not about those topics. What matters is that you subscribe to them. The company doesn't care if you end up never reading their content. That's not their problem. Their goal is to push as much content down your throat as possible so that they can collect little fees here and there. The bigger the amount of content you subscribe (not the quality), the bigger the fees they get.

The same is happening with Lightning wallets and many Bitcoin products that sustain themselves by taking a share of your transactions. They are incentivized to make users spend and not to help them manage their finances well.

Nostr won't be different. Zap-share Clients have an incentive to make you spend. In the long run, that is all they will care about. It doesn't matter if the content is good or not.

You become a Foie gras goose.

Social media has grappled with broken incentives since its inception. If we want to design a better social environment, it's our duty to find business models that are more aligned with the well-being of our users. We don't have a clear answer for that right now, but there is hope: we know what we want. We want to align the size of the user's contributions with products that make users feel better and more productive.

In the long run, this desire will split Clients between creator tools and consumer tools. Creator tools should help authors optimize their revenue stream while consumer tools should help readers optimize for their needs and well-being, independent of how much creator tools try to push content down your throat.

If you are a consumer of content (or more precisely, WHEN you are consuming content), you should reward those clients that hit the sweet spot for you without forcing you into spending more than what's needed. If you are a creator (or more precisely, WHEN you are creating content), you should reward clients who help you optimize the outcomes you desire for your content.

I find it hard to believe a single client can play both sides well. In a decentralized environment like ours, specialized clients will always win.

Remember to choose clients that are on your side. A creator's side is not always aligned with the consumer's side. When the eagles are silent, the parrots begin to jabber.


Hello Legends 🤙
I appreciate the love 💜

Christmas order deadline for 2023:
Order by 12/08/23 to ensure your unique #bitcoin merch arrives in time for the family holidays

🎄🎄🎄

https://juxtapose.store/store/p/bitcoin-ugly-sweater


****Sorry, Central Standard timezone!****
nostr:nevent1qqsx4cdzyfhzam9zvrxc88wswangex9nx7k7666df2e287sjmypya9cppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgs2wguqtndxwfg3j8y8sm6d5k8hjlnfwavzxqf4fw5wjx7tqdpde8qrqsqqqqqp977rdm


Advent: 1st candle

https://image.nostr.build/b497407b17ae00b6941a349cc30374d3ed4433f621554b15d599179d570ae1c5.jpg

#advent #photo #photography #art #artstr


I don't know any of them, thanks God.


For everyone who loves #nostr

When you #zap this post you receive this badge ⚡🤙

#grownostr #badge #bitcoin #artstr #plebchain

https://badges.page/b/naddr1qqy5ygpdypqjqknpwqpzqsa64uxz3ek0kx2mzlhqs0seavay4l06c4xek6a0zup8pmge8c6vqvzqqqr48yc75cpp https://i.nostr.build/5Mkw.jpg


🫂⚡💜 #success 🧡 #bitcoin  ⚡#nostr 💜🫂 https://image.nostr.build/630f56807c8eac5bc9263edbfff4077a5e02739c8f49f756c089a13444e598d1.jpg


You misunderstood me. I don't care about NSFW, but the freedom is not  about it. More precisely: not only...
Freedom is not so simple. Other parts of freedom for example that we can talk to each other in this way without any censorship.
But unfortunately this is not the perfect truth. Any of your words can be used against you in the future by e.g. government agencies. Don't think that they aren't able to identify you if they want by some reason you can't imagine now. Just ask nostr:npub1sn0wdenkukak0d9dfczzeacvhkrgz92ak56egt7vdgzn8pv2wfqqhrjdv9.


I believe less and less that this conversation is about freedom.
Talking about NSFW is only a little part of "freedom".
There is no point to confuse or mix the freedom with liberal things


Wow, what a liberal parental approach that if "kids find porn if they want to find porn". The next step is your daughter will be a sex worker if she want to be a sex worker. Just keep up the parenting this way...


Wtf????  At max minus 1BTC for this "artpiece"


There are also asshole billionaires 😆


That is all?
But you're right, it's worth laughing at all these sheep who follow you no matter what you do.
Your marketing is like Andy Warhol's 🤙
Some bitcoin related AI pictures and bitcoin bullshit in every post? 😁
And the plebs are all cheering on these...🙄


You are welcome, Leonard! 🙂


Math does nothing, just the computer and software you've written based on math algos.


I think this dumping is due to #Nostrasia, only #Nostr and #Bitcoin


I love it 😃 , have fun 🫂 sound on 🫡

https://video.nostr.build/fa6aca79e6ec662627934f96904187c623aa35d2d9080c498c6a09dfce4d96b8.mp4


GM Early Birds! 🙂💜


Keep #private https://image.nostr.build/2cc716c55623df8e89abcda72a3467ef713dc6c4f2859d718b19e6255a3a38fc.jpg


I hope it won't contain any censorship algorithm...


#Nostriches #Happydays 🔮
https://video.nostr.build/8a437b74116c32153e35720072bd47da426431408d5f03b7c60c2eb2994f1a58.mp4 #Nostr #Afterdark 🫡💜


#nostr for the nostriches, by the nostriches, of the nostriches
$boost
https://image.nostr.build/eee15b1acf02afc8d2da72ca8f87845edec7458f1e99e90c9af9dff553eb5a1e.webp


𝙸'𝚖 𝚊𝚗 𝙸𝚃 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕. 𝙸𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚖𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐... 😁

#it #dev #informatics #plebchain #grownostr #zap


The world is headed in this direction. Resist now or suffer in tyranny forever.

https://video.nostr.build/ed59c268dca89b8a259c9c667ef23101de94cd212f1379a96f6b139a2f88541b.mp4


Amongst other factors this depends on the diversity of posts' topics. So not just Bitcoin...


I already use old HP as a node. Raspi is not designed for this


won't it be too much?


Absolutely disagree, this offends the males


Fuck Soros


True.


Same, exept IQ. My real name is Forrest Gump


The real Brave

https://www.bleepstatic.com/content/hl-images/2022/06/22/Brave.jpg


Fuckin' good! 🤣


Only for gamblimg addicts


Absolutely right!


Now it's ok.


The original post is missing.


Not bad if your savings and investments are in Bitcoin